Anatomy, Comparative; Embryology, Human; Evolution; Human beings -- Origin
When, with the assistance of this tree, we follow the formation of the
various languages that have been developed from the common root of the
ancient Indo-Germanic tongue, we get a very clear idea of their
phylogeny. We shall see at the same time how analogous this is to the
development of the various groups of vertebrates that have arisen from
the common stem-form of the primitive vertebrate. The ancient
Indo-Germanic root-language divided first into two principal stems—the
Slavo-Germanic and the Aryo-Romanic. The Slavo-Germanic stem then
branches into the ancient Germanic and the ancient Slavo-Lettic
tongues; the Aryo-Romanic into the ancient Aryan and the ancient
Greco-Roman. If we still follow the genealogical tree of these four
Indo-Germanic tongues, we find that the ancient Germanic divides into
three branches—the Scandinavian, the Gothic, and the German. From the
ancient German came the High German and Low German; to the latter
belong the Frisian, Saxon, and modern Low-German dialects. The ancient
Slavo-Lettic divided first into a Baltic and a Slav language. The
Baltic gave rise to the Lett, Lithuanian, and old-Prussian varieties;
the Slav to the Russian and South-Slav in the south-east, and to the
Polish and Czech in the west.
We find an equally prolific branching of its two chief stems when we
turn to the other division of the Indo-Germanic languages. The
Greco-Roman divided into the Thracian (Albano-Greek) and the
Italo-Celtic. From the latter came the divergent branches of the Italic
(Roman and Latin) in the south, and the Celtic in the north: from the
latter have been developed all the British (ancient British, ancient
Scotch, and Irish) and Gallic varieties. The ancient Aryan gave rise to
the numerous Iranian and Indian languages.
This “comparative anatomy” and evolution of languages admirably
illustrates the phylogeny of species. It is clear that in structure and
development the primitive languages, mother and daughter languages, and
varieties, correspond exactly to the classes, orders, genera, and
species of the animal world. In both cases the “natural” system is
phylogenetic. As we have been convinced from comparative anatomy and
ontogeny, and from paleontology, that all past and living vertebrates
descend from a common ancestor, so the comparative study of dead and
living Indo-Germanic tongues proves beyond question that they are all
modifications of one primitive language. This view of their origin is
now accepted by all the chief philologists who have worked in this
branch and are unprejudiced.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account