Anatomy, Comparative; Embryology, Human; Evolution; Human beings -- Origin
Comparative anatomy and ontogeny prove beyond question that man is a
true vertebrate, and, therefore, man’s special genealogical tree must
be connected with that of the other Vertebrates, which spring from a
common root with him. But we have also many important grounds in
comparative anatomy and ontogeny for assuming a common origin for all
the Vertebrates. If the general theory of
evolution is correct, all the Vertebrates, including man, come from a
single common ancestor, a long-extinct “Primitive Vertebrate.” Hence
the genealogical tree of the Vertebrates is at the same time that of
the human race.
Our task, therefore, of constructing man’s genealogy becomes the larger
aim of discovering the genealogy of the entire vertebrate stem. As we
now know from the comparative anatomy and ontogeny of the Amphioxus and
the Ascidia, this is in turn connected with the genealogical tree of
the Invertebrates (directly with that of the Vermalia), but has no
direct connection with the independent stems of the Articulates,
Molluscs, and Echinoderms. If we do thus follow our ancestral tree
through various stages down to the lowest worms, we come inevitably to
the _Gastræa,_ that most instructive form that gives the clearest
possible picture of an animal with two germinal layers. The Gastræa
itself has originated from the simple multicellular vesicle, the
_Blastæa,_ and this in turn must have been evolved from the lowest
circle of unicellular animals, to which we give the name of Protozoa.
We have already considered the most important primitive type of these,
the unicellular _Amœba,_ which is extremely instructive when compared
with the human ovum. With this we reach the lowest of the solid data to
which we are to apply our biogenetic law, and by which we may deduce
the extinct ancestor from the embryonic form. The amœboid nature of the
young ovum and the unicellular condition in which (as stem-cell or
cytula) every human being begins its existence justify us in affirming
that the earliest ancestors of the human race were simple amœboid
coils.
But the further question now arises: “Whence came these first amœbæ
with which the history of life began at the commencement of the
Laurentian epoch?” There is only one answer to this. The earliest
unicellular organisms can only have been evolved from the simplest
organisms we know, the _Monera._ These are the simplest living things
that we can conceive. Their whole body is nothing but a particle of
plasm, a granule of living albuminous matter, discharging of itself all
the essential vital functions that form the material basis of life.
Thus we come to the last, or, if you prefer, the first, question in
connection with evolution—the question of the origin of the Monera.
This is the real question of the origin of life, or of spontaneous
generation.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account