Anatomy, Comparative; Embryology, Human; Evolution; Human beings -- Origin
It was not until 1871, twelve years after the appearance of _The Origin
of Species,_ that Darwin published the famous work which made the
much-contested application of his theory to man, and crowned the
splendid structure of his system. This important work was _The Descent
of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex._ In this Darwin expressly
drew the conclusion, with rigorous logic, that man also must have been
developed out of lower species, and described the important part played
by sexual selection in the elevation of man and the other higher
animals. He showed that the careful selection which the sexes exercise
on each other in regard to sexual relations and procreation, and the
æsthetic feeling which the higher animals develop through this, are of
the utmost importance in the progressive development of forms and the
differentiation of the sexes. The males choosing the handsomest females
in one class of animals, and the females choosing only the
finest-looking males in another, the special features and the sexual
characteristics are increasingly accentuated. In fact, some of the
higher animals develop in this connection a finer taste and judgment
than man himself. But, even as regards man, it is to this sexual
selection that we owe the family-life, which is the chief foundation of
civilisation. The rise of the human race is due for the most part to
the advanced sexual selection which our ancestors exercised in choosing
their mates.
Darwin accepted in the main the general outlines of man’s ancestral
tree, as I gave it in the _General Morphology_ and the _History of
Creation,_ and admitted that his studies led him to the same
conclusion. That he did not at once apply the theory to man in his
first work was a commendable piece of discretion; such a sequel was
bound to excite the strongest opposition to the whole theory. The first
thing to do was to establish it as regards the animal and plant worlds.
The subsequent extension to man was bound to be made sooner or later.
It is important to understand this very clearly. If all living things
come from a common root, man must be included in the general scheme of
evolution. On the other hand, if the various species were separately
created, man, too, must have been created, and not evolved. We have to
choose between these two alternatives. This cannot be too frequently or
too strongly emphasised. _Either_ all the species of animals and plants
are of supernatural origin—created, not evolved—and in that case man
also is the outcome of a creative act, as religion teaches, _or_ the
different species have been evolved from a few common, simple ancestral
forms, and in that case man is the highest fruit of the tree of
evolution.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account