Anatomy, Comparative; Embryology, Human; Evolution; Human beings -- Origin
We may state this briefly in the following principle—_The descent of
man from the lower animals is a special deduction which inevitably
follows from the general inductive law of the whole theory of
evolution._ In this principle we have a clear and plain statement of
the matter. Evolution is in reality nothing but a great induction,
which we are compelled to make by the comparative study of the most
important facts of morphology and physiology. But we must draw our
conclusion according to the laws of induction, and not attempt to
determine scientific truths by direct measurement and mathematical
calculation. In the study of living things we can scarcely ever
directly and fully, and with mathematical accuracy, determine the
nature of phenomena, as is done in the simpler study of the inorganic
world—in chemistry, physics, mineralogy, and astronomy. In the latter,
especially, we can always use the simplest and absolutely safest
method—that of mathematical determination. But in biology this is quite
impossible for various reasons; one very obvious reason being that most
of the facts of the science are very complicated and much too intricate
to allow a direct mathematical analysis. The greater part of the
phenomena that biology deals with are
complicated _historical processes,_ which are related to a far-reaching
past, and as a rule can only be approximately estimated. Hence we have
to proceed by _induction_—that is to say, to draw general conclusions,
stage by stage, and with proportionate confidence, from the
accumulation of detailed observations. These inductive conclusions
cannot command absolute confidence, like mathematical axioms; but they
approach the truth, and gain increasing probability, in proportion as
we extend the basis of observed facts on which we build. The importance
of these inductive laws is not diminished from the circumstance that
they are looked upon merely as temporary acquisitions of science, and
may be improved to any extent in the progress of scientific knowledge.
The same may be said of the attainments of many other sciences, such as
geology or archeology. However much they may be altered and improved in
detail in the course of time, these inductive truths may retain their
substance unchanged.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account