Anatomy, Comparative; Embryology, Human; Evolution; Human beings -- Origin
In recognising this, comparative anatomy has itself advanced to a
higher stage. Gegenbaur, the most distinguished of recent students of
this science, says that with the theory of evolution a new period began
in comparative anatomy, and that the theory in turn found a touch stone
in the science. “Up to now there is no fact in comparative anatomy that
is inconsistent with the theory of evolution; indeed, they all lead to
it. In this way the theory receives back from the science all the
service it rendered to its method.” Until then students had marvelled
at the wonderful resemblance of living things in their inner structure
without being able to explain it. We are now in a position to explain
the causes of this, by showing that this remarkable agreement is the
necessary consequence of the inheriting of common stem-forms; while the
striking difference in outward appearance is a result of adaptation to
changes of environment. Heredity and adaptation alone furnish the true
explanation.
But one special part of comparative anatomy is of supreme interest and
of the utmost philosophic importance in this connection. This is the
science of rudimentary or useless organs; I have given it the name of
“dysteleology” in view of its philosophic consequences. Nearly every
organism (apart from the very lowest), and especially every
highly-developed animal or plant, including man, has one or more organs
which are of no use to the body itself, and have no share in its
functions or vital aims. Thus we all have, in various parts of our
frame, muscles which we never use, as, for instance, in the shell of
the ear and adjoining parts. In most of the mammals, especially those
with pointed ears, these internal and external ear-muscles are of great
service in altering the shell of the ear, so as to catch the waves of
sound as much as possible. But in the case of man and other short-eared
mammals these muscles are useless, though they are still present. Our
ancestors having long abandoned the use of them, we cannot work them at
all to-day. In the inner corner of the eye we have a small
crescent-shaped fold of skin; this is the last relic of a third inner
eye-lid, called the nictitating (winking) membrane. This membrane is
highly developed and of great service in some of our distant relations,
such as fishes of the shark type and several other vertebrates; in us
it is shrunken and useless. In the intestines we have a process that is
not only quite useless, but may be very harmful—the vermiform
appendage. This small intestinal appendage is often the cause of a
fatal illness. If a cherry-stone or other hard body is unfortunately
squeezed through its narrow aperture during digestion, a violent
inflammation is set up, and often proves fatal. This appendix has no
use whatever now in our frame; it is a dangerous relic of an organ that
was much larger and was of great service in our vegetarian ancestors.
It is still large and important in many vegetarian animals, such as
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account