Anatomy, Comparative; Embryology, Human; Evolution; Human beings -- Origin
In many of the lower animals (such as sponges, polyps, and medusæ) the
naked ova retain their original simple appearance until impregnation.
But in most animals they at once begin to change; the change consists
partly in the formation of connections with the yelk, which serve to
nourish the ovum, and partly of external membranes for their protection
(the ovolemma, or prochorion). A membrane of this sort is formed in all
the mammals in the course of the embryonic process. The little globule
is surrounded by a thick capsule of glass-like transparency, the _ zona
pellucida,_ or _ovolemma pellucidum_ (Fig. 14). When we examine it
closely under the microscope, we see very fine radial streaks in it,
piercing the _ zona,_ which are really very narrow canals. The human
ovum, whether fertilised or not, cannot be distinguished from that of
most of the other mammals. It is nearly the same everywhere in form,
size, and composition. When it is fully formed, it has a diameter of
(on an average) about 1/120 of an inch. When the mammal ovum has been
carefully isolated, and held against the light on a glass-plate, it may
be seen as a fine point even with the naked eye. The ova of most of the
higher mammals are about the same size. The diameter of the ovum is
almost always between 1/250 to 1/125 inch. It has always the same
globular shape; the same characteristic membrane; the same transparent
germinal vesicle with its dark germinal spot. Even when we use the most
powerful microscope with its highest power, we can detect no material
difference between the ova of man, the ape, the dog, and so on. I do
not mean to say that there are no differences between the ova of these
different mammals. On the contrary, we are bound to assume that there
are such, at least as regards chemical composition. Even the ova of
different men must differ from each other; otherwise we should not have
a different individual from each ovum. It is true that our crude and
imperfect apparatus cannot detect these subtle individual differences,
which are probably in the molecular structure. However, such a striking
resemblance of their ova in form, so great as to seem to be a complete
similarity, is a strong proof of the common parentage of man and the
other mammals. From the common germ-form we infer a common stem-form.
On the other hand, there are striking peculiarities by which we can
easily distinguish the fertilised ovum of the mammal from the
fertilised ovum of the birds, amphibia, fishes, and other vertebrates
(see the close of Chap. XXIX).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account