Anatomy, Comparative; Embryology, Human; Evolution; Human beings -- Origin
It is, therefore, no audacious hypothesis, but a perfectly sound
conclusion, to regard the amœba as the particular unicellular organism
which offers us an approximate illustration of the ancient common
unicellular ancestor of all the metazoa, or multicellular animals. The
simple naked amœba has a less definite and more original character than
any other cell. Moreover, there is the fact that recent research has
discovered such amœba-like cells everywhere in the mature body of the
multicellular animals. They are found, for instance, in the human
blood, side by side with the red corpuscles, as colourless blood-cells;
and it is the same with all the vertebrates. They are also found in
many of the invertebrates—for instance, in the blood of the snail. I
showed, in 1859, that these colourless blood-cells can, like the
independent amœbæ, take up solid particles, or “eat” (whence they are
called _phagocytes_ = “eating-cells,” Fig. 19). Lately, it has been
discovered that many different cells may, if they have room enough,
execute the same movements, creeping about and eating. They behave just
like amœbæ (Fig. 12). It has also been shown that these
“travelling-cells,” or _planocytes,_ play an important part in man’s
physiology and pathology (as means of transport for food, infectious
matter, bacteria, etc.).
The power of the naked cell to execute these characteristic amœba-like
movements comes from the contractility (or automatic mobility) of its
protoplasm. This seems to be a universal property of young cells. When
they are not enclosed by a firm membrane, or confined in a “cellular
prison,” they can always accomplish these amœboid movements. This is
true of the naked ova as well as of any other naked cells, of the
“travelling-cells,” of various kinds in connective tissue, lymph-cells,
mucus-cells, etc.
Fig.18. Ovum of a sponge. Fig. 18—Ovum of a sponge (_Olynthus_). The
ovum creeps about in a body of the sponge by thrusting out
ever-changing processes. It is indistinguishable from the common
amœba.)
We have now, by our study of the ovum and the comparison of it with the
amœba, provided a perfectly sound and most valuable foundation for both
the embryology and the evolution of man. We have learned that the human
ovum is a simple cell, that this ovum is not materially different from
that of other mammals, and that we may infer from it the existence of a
primitive unicellular ancestral form, with a substantial resemblance to
the amœba.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account