The Evolution of Man Scientifically Disproved in 50 ArgumentsWilliams, William A. (William Asbury)
Religion
The Evolution of Man Scientifically Disproved in 50 Arguments
Williams, William A. (William Asbury)
Evolution
We are asked to believe that these scattered bones,—some the bones of a
modern brute, some the bones of a modern man—were preserved in the sand
750,000 years and belonged to an ancestor of the human race, while of
the millions of his generation and of the generations following for
many thousands of years, we have not a trace! We are asked upon such a
flimsy pretext to accept a theory, unsupported by a single compelling
argument, and irreconcilable with numerous facts,—a theory which takes
away man’s hope of immortality, destroys faith in God and his inspired
word, and in the Christian religion itself. There is a limit. How much
more truthful and majestic is Gen. 1:27: “And God created man in his
own image, in the image of God created he him.”
One distinguished evolutionist has said, “We might as well be made out
of monkey as out of mud. It is mud or monkey.” Most of us would retort,
“I would rather be created a human being out of the filthiest mud by
Almighty God than owe my existence to the brainiest monkey that ever
lived.” Please note, “The Lord God formed man of the _dust_ of the
ground,” not _mud_. The evolutionists are as wild in their exegesis as
in their guesses.
2. The Heidelberg Jaw. The second relic, in the order of time, relied
upon by the evolutionists to prove the brute origin of man, is a “human
jaw of great antiquity, discovered in the _sands_ of the Mauer River,
near Heidelberg.” Hence, it is called the Mauer jaw, or the Heidelberg
Jaw, or Heidelberg man, or the high sounding Latin name of Homo
Heidelbergensis. It needs all the names that can be given to it, to
elevate it to the dignity of an ancestor. “This jaw was found in
undisturbed stratified _sand_, (sand again) at the depth of about 69
feet from the summit of the deposit.” Dr. Schoetensack, the discoverer,
says, “Had the teeth been absent, it would have been impossible to
diagnose it as human.”
They say it is 700,000 years old, preserved in sand. A later estimate
says 375,000 years. (Any wild guess will do.) It resembles the jaw of
an ape, and the tooth of a man. Was it not likely the abnormal jaw of a
modern man, in historic time swept into the sands by the freshets and
floods of a few centuries? It is only fair to say that many scientists
of the evolutionary school, do not believe the Heidelberg man an
ancestor of our race. “These remains,” says one, “show no trace of
being intermediate between man and the anthropoid ape.” Some claim it a
connecting link. Others deny it. Some say the find is of the utmost
value; others say it is worthless. All are guesses, wild guesses at
that. They hopefully reach out their hands in the night, and gather
nothing but handfuls of darkness.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account