The Evolution of Man Scientifically Disproved in 50 ArgumentsWilliams, William A. (William Asbury)
Religion
The Evolution of Man Scientifically Disproved in 50 Arguments
Williams, William A. (William Asbury)
Evolution
Personality is consciousness of individuality. When did personality
begin? When did any members of the species become conscious of
personality? When did they begin to realize and to say in thought, “I
am a living being.” What animals are conscious of personality? Any of
our cousins of the monkey tribe? Is the horse conscious of personality,
or the ox, the cat or the dog? If so, does the skunk have personality,
the mouse, the flea, the worm, the tadpole, the microscopic animal? If
so, do our other cousins have personality,—the trees, the vines, the
flowers, the thorn and the brier, the cactus and the thistle, and the
microscopic disease germs? If so, when did personality begin? With the
first primordial germ? If so, were there two personalities when the
germ split in two, and became two, animal and plant? You can not split
a man up into two parts with a personality to each part. Personality is
indivisible. It is a consciousness of that indivisibility. If
personality began anywhere along the line, where, when, and how did it
originate? Was it spontaneous, or by chance, or was it God-given?
Beyond all question, it was the gift of an all-wise and all-powerful
Creator, and in no sense the product of evolution. God made man a
living soul.
But if no plant or animal ever had personality, when did man first
become conscious of his individuality? There is no evidence, of course,
but the evolutionist must produce it, or admit failure. The
evolutionist is short on evidence but long on guesses that miss the
mark.
If all animals and plants came from one germ, why do animals have the
senses, sight, taste, touch, smell and hearing, while plants are
utterly devoid of them? They had a nearly equal chance in the race. Why
the great difference?
37. INTELLECT, EMOTIONS AND WILL
The activity and energy of the soul are shown in the intellect, the
emotions and the will. What evidence of these do we find in the animal
world? Do we find intellect in the lobster, emotions in a worm, or will
in an oyster? Whence came these elements of spiritual strength? If
developed by evolution, where, when, and how?
Have the most advanced species of animals an intellect? Do they have
the emotions of love, hate, envy, pity, remorse or sympathy? Has a worm
envy, a flea hate, a cat pity a hog remorse, or a horse sympathy? If
these existed in so-called pre-historic man, when, where, and how did
they begin? No one can answer, because there is not a trace of proof
that they ever existed.
Will natural selection explain the development of the mental faculties?
Was art developed because those who lacked it perished? Do we account
for the musical faculty, because those who could not sing perished?
Some still live who ought to be dead! Do we account for humor because
they perished who could not crack a joke? Will all eventually perish
but the Irish, who will survive by their wit? Is anything mentioned in
science quite so ridiculous as natural selection?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account