The Evolution of Man Scientifically Disproved in 50 ArgumentsWilliams, William A. (William Asbury)
Religion
The Evolution of Man Scientifically Disproved in 50 Arguments
Williams, William A. (William Asbury)
Evolution
Sin is a great fact. It can not be denied. It can not be explained by
evolution. It is universal. Every race all nations, with all grades of
intellect and culture, civilized or uncivilized, are cursed with sin.
All the wrongs, all crimes in the world, all immoralities, are due to
sin. Sin causes tremendous destruction of life, property, and
character. Why is it universal? When did it originate? Did it originate
in all the members of the brute-human race at one time? Did some become
sinners, and others remain without sin? Sin must be developed, since
brutes have no sin. Why not some of the ape-humans without sin? Does
natural selection explain the universal sinfulness of man, on the
ground that those who did not have this “improvement” perished? They
all died and only sinners were left, hence all survivors are sinners!
Sin makes men more fit, and hence sinners only survive! Is evolution
simply ridiculous, or a crime?
When in the “ascent of man” did he become a sinner? A million years
ago? Judging from the pictures of fierce alleged ape-men, it must have
been a long, long time ago. Did all become sinners then? What became of
the progeny of those who had not secured the attainment of sin? Why
have not other members of the monkey family become sinners? Why do we
not hang them for murder? Will they yet attain unto sinfulness?
H. G. Wells, the alleged historian, says, p. 954, Outline of Hist., “If
all the animals and man had been evolved in this ascendant manner, then
there had been no first parents, no Eden and no Fall. And, if there had
been no Fall, then the entire historical fabric of Christianity, the
story of the first sin, and the reason for an atonement upon which the
current teaching based Christian emotion and morality, collapses like a
house of cards.”
Evolution claims that man fell up and not down. It denies almost every
truth of religion and the Bible, as well as of experience. “Man is
falling upward, he is his own Savior, he is ever progressing, and has
no need of a Savior.” Contrast this with the sublime statements of the
word of God concerning the creation and the fall of man.
Evolution is charged with explaining all phenomena pertaining to
man,—soul and body. It exhausts itself in trying to show that the body
of man may _possibly_ be developed from the brute. It fails miserably.
The problem of accounting for the soul of man with all its equipment is
so much more difficult, that little or no effort is made to account for
it, virtually confessing that the much-exploited theory of evolution
can not possibly be true, when applied to the soul as well as the body.
43. REDEMPTION
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account