The Evolution of Man Scientifically Disproved in 50 ArgumentsWilliams, William A. (William Asbury)
Religion
The Evolution of Man Scientifically Disproved in 50 Arguments
Williams, William A. (William Asbury)
Evolution
Evolution wars with the religion of the Jews also. It attacks the Old
Testament, dear alike to Christian and Jew. The Jews were the chosen
people of God, and have played a large part in the history of the
world. We gladly clasp hands with them against the common foe. David
speaks for Jews and Christians in the 8th Psalm. In contrast to
evolution, which degrades man to the level of the brute, he declares
that man is but a little lower than God, (Heb. Elohim). The revisers
had the courage so to translate it. David under inspiration wrote
better than he knew, and in absolute harmony with modern science:
“When I consider thy heavens, the work of thy fingers, the moon and the
stars which thou hast ordained, what is man (how great must he be) that
thou are mindful of him (among thy great and marvelous works)? And the
son of man that thou are a companion to him? For thou hast made him but
little lower than God, and crownest him with glory and honor. Thou
madest him to have dominion over the works of thy hands; thou hast put
all things under his feet; all sheep and oxen, yea, and the beasts of
the field; the fowl of the air, and the fish of the sea, whatsoever
passeth through the paths of the seas.” All animals confess the
dominion of man since the strongest and fiercest flee from his face.
Who would prefer the “string of stuff” that would place man below the
brute, to the lofty description of the Hebrew Psalmist placing him a
little lower than God?
Hon. William J. Bryan, when attending the Presbyterian General Assembly
in Columbus, Ohio, in 1925, enclosed, in a letter to the writer, a copy
of his address in John Wanamaker’s Church, Philadelphia, on evolution
and modernism, from which we select the following:
“All the modernists are evolutionists and their hypothesis of creation
gives man a brute ancestry and makes him the apex of a gradual
development extending over millions of years. This hypothesis contains
no place for, and has no need of, a plan of salvation. It is only a
step from this philosophy to the philosophy of the atheist who
considers man ‘a bundle of tendencies inherited from the lower
animals,’ and regards sin as nothing more serious than a disease that
should be treated rather than punished. One of the gravest objections
to the doctrine of the modernists is that it ignores sin in the sense
in which the Bible describes sin. Modernists ignore the cause of sin,
the effects of sin, and the remedy for sin. They worship the intellect
and overlook the heart, ‘out of which are the issues of life.’ No
evangelical church has ever endorsed a single doctrine of the
modernists.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account