The Evolution of Man Scientifically Disproved in 50 ArgumentsWilliams, William A. (William Asbury)
Religion
The Evolution of Man Scientifically Disproved in 50 Arguments
Williams, William A. (William Asbury)
Evolution
They ask us to believe, without proof, that some marine animals
evoluted into amphibians, some amphibians became reptiles, some
reptiles developed hair and became mammals, and some reptiles developed
feathers and wings and became birds; some mammals became monkeys, and
some monkeys became men. For evidence of this, there is not a single
connecting link to show the transformation. Geology furnishes no
fossils of the millions and billions of connecting links that must have
existed. For the scheme would require not only millions of links
between man and the monkey, but also millions between each of the 8
great changes from matter to man. Yet we are asked to accept these
fantastic and impossible speculations as “science,” though it lead to
infidelity and atheism and bolshevism and anarchy and chaos, wreck
religion, make havoc of the church, and send countless souls to the
lost world. What wonder that the soul recoils with horror from such an
atheistic theory.
48. WHAT CAN WE DO?
Evolution, leading to infidelity and atheism, is taught in many
universities, colleges and high schools, and even in the lower grades
of the public schools. It is taught also in some theological
seminaries. It is proclaimed in some pulpits. Some of its devotees, who
have slipped into places of power and influence, urge it with a zeal
worthy of a better cause. The public libraries are crammed with books
teaching it, with few, if any, opposed. Strange to say, it is advocated
by some religious newspapers, along with modernism and other varieties
of infidelity. Some secular newspapers seem eager to publish, on the
front page, attacks on orthodoxy, and articles favoring the wildest
claims of evolution. They call evolution science! What are we going to
do about it? Shall we supinely submit, or do all in our power to
oppose, check and suppress so pernicious a theory? What can we do?
We can refuse to patronize or endow such institutions as teach this or
other forms of infidelity and atheism. We can aid those only that are
safe. Much money that was given by devout Christians to colleges and
seminaries, has been prostituted to teach what the donors hated, and to
do great harm. The faculty and trustees can do much to eliminate false
teaching, if they will. Use all possible pressure to bring this about.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account