The Evolution of Marriage and of the FamilyLetourneau, Ch. (Charles)
Science
The Evolution of Marriage and of the Family
Letourneau, Ch. (Charles)
Families; Marriage
[711] Wake, _Evolution of Morality_, vol. ii. p. 85.
[712] _Institutes_, iv., tit. 18.
[713] Friedländer, _Mœurs Romaines_, etc., t. I^{er.} p. 367.
[714] Socrates, _Hist. Eccles._, lib. v., cap. xviii.
[715] Friedländer, etc., _Mœurs_, t. I^{er.} p. 367.
[716] Klaproth and Gamba, _Hist. Univ. des Voy._, t. xlv. p. 435.
[717] Klaproth and Gamba, _Hist. Univ. des Voy._, t. xlv. p. 448.
[718] Desmaze, _Curiosités_, etc.
CHAPTER XIV.
REPUDIATION AND DIVORCE.
I. _In Savage Countries._--The right of repudiation in New Caledonia,
among the Hottentots, the Bongos, the Soulimas, the Fantis, the
Ashantees--Divorce in Polynesia--The right of repudiation in America.
II. _Divorce and Repudiation among Barbarous Peoples._--In Abyssinia,
at Hayti--The _nefir_ of the Djebel-Taggale--Repudiation among
the Bedouins and the Touaregs--Repudiation among the Kabyles--The
“prevented” Kabyle woman--The “insurgent” Kabyle woman--Repudiation
among the Arabs--Divorce among the Arabs--Obligatory
divorce--Repudiation on account of non-virginity--Divorce by mutual
consent in Peru and Thibet--Repudiation among the Mongols--Repudiation
in China--Obligatory divorce in China--Repudiation in ancient
India--Repudiation among the Hebrews--Repudiation in Greece--Evolution
of repudiation and divorce in ancient Rome--Divorce and
Christianity--Repudiation in barbarous Europe, in France, in the
Middle Ages.
III. _The Evolution of Divorce._
I. _In Savage Countries._
I have no longer to demonstrate that woman has been treated with
extreme brutality among nearly all primitive peoples. In the lowest
stage of savagery--as, for example, in Australia and Tasmania--woman,
being exactly assimilated to a domestic animal, who can be beaten,
wounded, killed, and even eaten, her association with man does not
merit the name of marriage, and consequently there is no question among
these races of divorce, nor even of repudiation. The man, being able,
as master, to dispose of the life of his wife, has, in addition, the
right to send her away, or abandon her, if he chooses.
In New Caledonia, where the stage of the most brutal savagery is past,
where the wife is no longer carried off as in Australia, but bought
from her legal owners, the dissolution of the conjugal union is still
ill-regulated. The man can chase away or repudiate his wife. The couple
can also part by mutual agreement, the children following sometimes
the mother and sometimes the father; nothing is uniform.[719] But the
purchase of the woman protects her already somewhat against murder. As
she represents a capital, the husband often hesitates to kill her, or
even to drive her away.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account