The Evolution of Naval ArmamentRobertson, Frederick Leslie
History
The Evolution of Naval Armament
Robertson, Frederick Leslie
Naval art and science -- History; Ordnance, Naval -- History; Warships -- History
Much, he saw, yet remained to be done to obtain economical expenditure
of steam. In particular the open-topped cylinder, whose walls were
chilled at every descent of the piston by contact with atmospheric air,
was an obvious source of inefficiency. He therefore determined not
to expose the walls to the atmosphere at all, but to enclose all the
space above the piston; and, thinking thus, he conceived the idea of
replacing the air above the piston by steam, an equally powerful agent.
The cylinder he proposed to maintain at a constant high temperature by
means of a layer of hot steam with which he encased it, which he called
a steam jacket. And so the atmospheric engine as left by Newcomen
evolved into the _single-acting steam engine_ of Watt;--an engine in
which steam was still used below the piston, only to displace air
and provide a vacuized space for the downward motion of the piston;
but in which steam now acted positively above the piston, in lieu
of atmospheric air, to drive it down. It was still a sufficiently
primitive form of prime mover. The piston was still lifted by the
counterweight at the other end of the timber cross-beam; the engine had
not yet developed the organs necessary for producing a satisfactory
rotary motion. This step was shortly to follow.
In 1769 Watt obtained his patent for the “double impulse,” as it
was called; and by this step, by the transition from a single- to a
double-acting engine, the possibilities of such machines for every
variety of application first came into general view. This stage of
the development showed to the full the ingenuity of Watt’s mechanical
mind. By the invention of the slide-valve he distributed steam to
the top and to the bottom of the cylinder, and in appropriate phase
with these actions opened the two ends to the condenser; so that the
piston was actuated positively and by an equal force on both up and
down strokes. The chain by which the piston had been suspended was no
longer adequate; it was replaced by a rod. A straight-line motion was
required for the top end of the rod; so he formed a rack, to gear with
the circular end or horse-head of the beam. But this noisy mechanism
was soon superseded by another contrivance, the beautifully simple
“parallel motion,” in which two circular motions are combined to
produce one which is rectilinear. This was patented in ’84.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account