The Evolution of Naval ArmamentRobertson, Frederick Leslie
History
The Evolution of Naval Armament
Robertson, Frederick Leslie
Naval art and science -- History; Ordnance, Naval -- History; Warships -- History
In the meantime M. Paixhans had made further progress toward perfecting
the details of his shell gun system. A _canon-obusier_ of 80 pounds
was made to his design, a chambered howitzer of the same weight
(about 72 hundredweight) as the French 36-pounder truck gun and of 22
centimetres calibre. This was designed to project a hollow shell of
the same size as the French 80-pound solid shot, but weighing, when
its cavity was filled with a charge of 4 pounds of powder, 56 pounds
French (62½ pounds English). The shell gun itself was of a distinctive
shape. The characteristics of short chase, large bore, a chamber, a
small propelling charge, and a scientific elimination of all useless
metal, resulted in a form of ordnance quite different from that of the
long-accepted smooth-bore cannon. It was easily recognizable by its
straight muzzle, smooth lines and the absence of the usual ornaments
and reinforcing rings. When, eventually, the New Arm was adopted by
other powers, their shell guns too, though independently evolved, were
found to exhibit the same external features: the features of what came
to be known universally as a “Paixhans gun.”
The terrific effect of charged shell, fired from this form of gun
with sufficient velocity to find a lodgment in a ship’s timbers, was
demonstrated at Brest in 1821 and 1824; in the latter trials the target
being a frigate, the _Pacificateur_, moored in the roadstead. High
range and accurate shooting were obtained. The incendiary effect of
the shell was prodigious: so impressive, indeed, that in spite of a
strong opinion in the French navy against further carriage of bombs in
ships-of-the-line, the Commission recommended “that _canons-à-bombe_ be
adopted, even in ships-of-the-line, but in small numbers.”
But though the principle of the shell gun was accepted by experts,
public opinion was not yet ready for the change. The Commission had
shown a sage circumspection in regard to the extent of the change
proposed; but public opinion was not yet satisfied that the new arm
was sufficiently safe. The scheme suffered a long postponement. In the
meantime several further trials were held. The design of the piece
was again modified; a larger chamber was arranged and a support was
cast, at the commencement of the chase, for carrying a sight. Tests _à
outrance_ were made to find what maximum charge such a shell gun would
safely stand; and at last, in 1837, the principle of shell fire was
accepted by the government, the Paixhans gun being assigned a place
in the prescribed armament of the fleets of France. To the impairment
of the unity-of-calibre principle, lately achieved, shell guns of 22
centimetres were admitted as part-armament of ships the greater number
of whose pieces were 30-pounders firing solid shot.
[Illustration: A PAIXHANS GUN]
§
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account