The Evolution of Naval ArmamentRobertson, Frederick Leslie
History
The Evolution of Naval Armament
Robertson, Frederick Leslie
Naval art and science -- History; Ordnance, Naval -- History; Warships -- History
The plans of M. Paixhans, in particular those for the adoption of shell
fire on a large scale, were viewed with much misgiving in this country.
But, as already noted, Great Britain moved very cautiously in the
counter-measures which she took in view of the policy then under review
in France. It is probable that the publication, in 1828, of a memoir
by Captain F. A. Hastings, R.N., commanding the Greek steam vessel
of war _Karteria_, had great effect in encouraging the authorities
to countenance shell fire. From this memoir it appears that Captain
Hastings was led, by arguments similar to those which influenced M.
Paixhans, to consider the possibilities of discharging at an enemy
something more devastating in effect than the solid sphere of iron
in general use. His navy was inferior in numbers to possible rivals;
he expressed the opinion that this inferiority might be nullified by
the use of shell, but he “got well laughed at for his pains.” Soon
afterwards, however, he came across Paixhans’ work. Acting on his
ideas, he applied shell fire with great success in action, and at once
became an enthusiastic advocate of the new arm. One great objection
to its adoption he almost laid to rest: the increased danger due to
the carriage of shells. He denied that there was any increased danger.
On the contrary, he considered charged shells less dangerous than
powder in cartridges, if properly packed. They were less dangerous,
he argued, because their use involved bigger and therefore fewer guns
than an ordinary ship would carry. Therefore there was less confusion
in action, less jostling, more working spaces, and fewer cartridges and
projectiles to be handled. In support of his opinion he could point to
an entire absence of accidents during his commission in the _Karteria_.
In 1829 a general increase of calibre was obtained by the inexpensive
expedient of boring out guns to their next larger calibre; in which
operation the opportunity was taken to arrange for a reduced allowance
of windage for the guns thus altered, and thus to secure a double gain,
of increased calibre and improved discharge. Experiments were made
with shell fire _à la Paixhans_. Tentative designs of shell gun were
produced by the ordnance department, and guns of 8-inch, 10-inch and
12-inch calibre were made; one of which, an 8-inch, mounted in H.M.S.
_Phœnix_, made very effective shooting at San Sebastian in the year ’36
and gave thereby an advertisement to shell fire.
And then, in 1837, came the French decision to adopt a shell gun
armament generally.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account