The Evolution of Naval ArmamentRobertson, Frederick Leslie
History
The Evolution of Naval Armament
Robertson, Frederick Leslie
Naval art and science -- History; Ordnance, Naval -- History; Warships -- History
Even at this period the idea of using manual labour, applied in an
effective manner, for towing and bringing into position sailing
warships had not been altogether abandoned. In 1802 the transport
_Doncaster_ had been propelled at a slow speed in Malta harbour by the
invention of a Mr. Shorter: a screw propeller rigged over the stern.
In 1820 experiments were made at Portsmouth with paddlewheels manually
worked, and in ’29 Captain C. Napier took his ship _Galatea_ out of
Portsmouth Harbour by use of paddlewheels geared to winches which
were worked by the crew. One hundred and thirty men were able to give
her a speed of 2½ knots, while the full crew of a hundred and ninety
produced a speed of three. After this doubtful success another trial
was held--a race between the _Galatea_, propelled by paddles, and
the _Briton_, towed by boats--which _Galatea_ won. Captain Napier’s
paddlewheels afterwards did good work for his ship in other quarters
of the world.[147] Nothing resulted, however, from his initiative
in this connection; only was emphasized the enormous superiority of
steam-propelled vessels as tugs, in which capacity they had already
made their appearance, and from which they were destined to evolve, in
the next decade, into fighting vessels of considerable force.
By 1830 steam navigation had made significant strides along the
lines of commercial development. In that year a service of steam
mail boats started to run at regular intervals between Falmouth and
Corfu, covering the distance in about one-fourth of the time which
had been taken by the sailing packets; a Dutch government steamer,
the _Curaçoa_, built in England, had since ’27 been running between
Holland and the East Indies; and already the Indian Government had
built an armed steamer, designed as the forerunner of others which were
to connect Bombay with Suez and thus to place India in more direct
communication with England.
The navy was still represented only by paddle-tugs. With a change
of administration, however, came a change in Admiralty policy. The
new Board took a distinctly progressive view. It was agreed that,
if foreign powers initiated the building of steam war-vessels, this
country must build as well, and not only as well but better: a policy
tersely summed up by Admiral Sir T. M. Hardy in his saying, “Happen
what will, England must take the lead.” Certain objections to steam
vessels as naval units which had hitherto held a vogue were now seen
to be ill-founded or baseless. In particular it was discovered, not
without surprise to many, that steamers could be manœuvred without
difficulty. A paddlewheel steamer, the _Medea_, gained her commander
considerable credit from the skill with which she was navigated from
the Thames into the basin at Woolwich dockyard, which proved that
steamers could be steered and manœuvred better than sailing ships.
In ’33 the construction of steamers was placed in the hands of the
Surveyor.[148]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account