The evolution of scientific thought from Newton to EinsteinD'Abro, A. (Aram)
Science
The evolution of scientific thought from Newton to Einstein
D'Abro, A. (Aram)
Relativity (Physics); Science -- Methodology
For the geometry of a space of more than two dimensions to be
determined fully, we must state the values of the components of the
tensor (mentioned in the note); there being twenty such
components at every point for a four-dimensional space. We may note
that, contrary to the Gaussian curvature , is not
invariant. It splits up into components each one of which may vary
in value when the mesh-system is changed. Yet, in spite of this
variability, still defines the curvatures of the space,
hence still refers to something that is intrinsic and irrelevant to
our choice of mesh-system. Such is one of the characteristics of
a tensor. This particular tensor of twenty components (in
a four-dimensional space) is known as the Riemann-Christoffel
tensor.[33] Curiously enough, it was discovered by Riemann, not
when investigating the geometry of space, but when considering a
problem in heat.
Only when every one of these twenty components of the tensor
vanishes at every point is it possible to assert that
the four-dimensional space is Euclidean, or at least flat. Thus,
whereas for two dimensions Euclideanism was ensured when one condition
was satisfied at every point, namely, the vanishing of the Gaussian
curvature, , on the other hand, when we step up to four
dimensions, twenty conditions are needed, and these are given by the
vanishing at every point of the twenty expressions which in their
aggregate constitute the Riemann-Christoffel tensor .
We may also mention that in addition to the Riemann-Christoffel tensor
, Einstein has made use of the other tensor
(previously discovered by Ricci), which in four-dimensional space
is defined by ten separate relations between the values of the
[Pg 98]
’s at a point and their values at neighbouring points. The
vanishing of this other tensor at every point, that is
to say, the vanishing of the ten new component expressions at every
point, is insufficient in itself to ensure the Euclideanism of the
space; although, of course, this vanishing imposes certain restrictions
on the space’s non-Euclideanism. These restrictions are less severe
than those defined by the vanishing of the twenty components of the
Riemann-Christoffel tensor, which ensures perfect flatness; on the
other hand, they are more stringent than those imposed by a mere
vanishing of the Gaussian curvature .[34]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account