The evolution of scientific thought from Newton to EinsteinD'Abro, A. (Aram)
Science
The evolution of scientific thought from Newton to Einstein
D'Abro, A. (Aram)
Relativity (Physics); Science -- Methodology
CLASSICAL MECHANICS AND THE NEWTONIAN PRINCIPLE
OF RELATIVITY
WE mentioned, when discussing amorphous mathematical space, that
position and hence motion could have no meaning other than that
of expressing conditions with respect to some particular frame of
reference. In short, the visual principle of relativity would have to
be adhered to.
We will accordingly select some arbitrary system of reference, which
we will assume to be defined by three mutually perpendicular planes
meeting at a common point . The instantaneous position of a
body will henceforth be defined when we have measured with rigid
rods its distances from the three planes of our frame; and the only
type of position and of motion of the body which we can define in an
unambiguous way will be its position and motion as referred to our
frame.
The measurement of the velocity of the body with respect to our frame
necessitates the addition of a clock. We will assume that this clock
beats out congruent intervals of time, where congruence is, of course,
defined by the requirements of practical congruence for time, that is,
by the beatings of some isolated periodic mechanism.
Now, it is perfectly apparent that unless referred to some particular
frame, the path followed by a body and its motion along this path can
have no determinate meaning. Thus, if in a uniformly moving train we
throw a ball into the air and catch it again in our hands, then, as
referred to the train, the ball will have followed an up-and-down
motion along the same vertical; on the other hand, as referred to
the embankment, the ball will have described a parabola. Again, if a
stone is allowed to fall from a great height, its motion with respect
to the earth will be accelerated, whereas, with respect to a frame of
reference falling together with the stone, it will have remained at
rest.
It would thus appear that we might credit to the path followed by
a body any arbitrary shape we wished; all we should have to do
would be to select some appropriate frame of reference. The same
indeterminateness would, of course, apply to the motion of the body
along its path. Thus the shape of a path in space (rectilinear or
curved) or the species of a motion (uniform or accelerated) could have
no absolute significance. From the standpoint of mathematical space
these would all be essentially relative to the reference frame we had
selected.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account