The evolution of scientific thought from Newton to EinsteinD'Abro, A. (Aram)
Science
The evolution of scientific thought from Newton to Einstein
D'Abro, A. (Aram)
Relativity (Physics); Science -- Methodology
If we follow Mach and Neumann and assume that the various internal
dynamical conditions which distinguish the various frames are due
to influences of an extrinsic nature, we shall no longer be able to
subscribe to Newton’s conclusions; for we shall no longer be able to
assume that were the entire outside universe to be annihilated, the
internal conditions in our frames would endure as before. Henceforth,
when ascribing the appearance of centrifugal and Coriolis forces to the
rotation of the body, we should have to imply that this rotation was
relative to a something in the universe that was not the empty
space in which the frame was situated. The natural conclusion was that
this rotation was relative to that other form of existence, namely, to
matter. Neumann suggested a mysterious body called the “Alpha Body,” to
whose dynamical influence he ascribed the rise of inertial forces; but,
as Poincaré remarked, “Of this mysterious Alpha Body all we can ever
know is its name.” A hypothesis such as Neumann’s, which is incapable
of verification, reduces to a mere metaphysical speculation of no
scientific value whatsoever.
Mach adopted a much more plausible alternative. He assumed that the
rotation of the frame which appeared to accompany centrifugal and
Coriolis forces was a rotation with respect to the remainder of the
physical universe, hence to the totality of the matter of the universe.
As the vastest agglomeration of matter in the universe is given by
the totality of the star masses, we are led to Mach’s conclusions,
namely, that the forces of inertia arise from a relative rotation or
acceleration of the frame with respect to the universe of stars. Were
the stars, then, to be annihilated, centrifugal force and all forces
of inertia would vanish, a rotating mass of water would not splash
over the sides of a bucket, and so forth. It is, of course, scarcely
necessary to mention that the actual visibility of the stars or our
mere ability to imagine their existence has nothing to do with the
problem; it is solely the causal influences produced by their masses
and relative acceleration which are relevant.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account