The evolution of scientific thought from Newton to EinsteinD'Abro, A. (Aram)
Science
The evolution of scientific thought from Newton to Einstein
D'Abro, A. (Aram)
Relativity (Physics); Science -- Methodology
Its resistance to motion was practically nil—far less than that
of a gas like the atmosphere; since the frictional effects due to
the atmosphere are sufficient to cause shooting stars to become
incandescent, while no such effect was observed in those regions of
ether-filled space extending beyond the limits of the atmosphere.
Besides, if motion through the ether generated friction, mechanical
phenomena should be influenced by the velocity of our Galilean frame
through space and hence through the ether; but so far as experiment
was able to decide, no such influences had ever been detected. (This
was indeed the essence of the Newtonian principle of relativity.)
It appeared, therefore, that the ether must be assimilable to some
ultra-rarefied gas. On the other hand, the transverse vibrations of
light waves were compatible only with the existence of a rigid medium;
but between the properties of rigidity and of extreme rarefaction there
was an obvious contradiction. Yet, however baffling and artificial the
ether appeared to be, it was extremely hard to banish it from science
owing to the great mass of experimental evidence that appeared to lend
support to its existence.
At any rate, once the existence of a semi-material ether was accepted,
it was natural to suppose that the motion of our optical and electrical
apparatus through its substance should exert a perceptible influence on
the results of experiment. Just as the velocity of the wind adds itself
to the velocity of sound waves propagated through the atmosphere, so
was it logical to anticipate, in view of our understanding of light
waves and of electrical phenomena, that an ether wind should carry the
light waves and ether strains along with it. Optical and electrical
experiments conducted with sufficient refinement should therefore be
susceptible of detecting the velocity of our planet through the ether;
so that in contradistinction to the relativity of Galilean motion for
[Pg 117]
mechanical phenomena with which the ether was not concerned, Galilean
motion would be anything but relative were electromagnetic or optical
experiments to be attempted.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account