The evolution of scientific thought from Newton to EinsteinD'Abro, A. (Aram)
Science
The evolution of scientific thought from Newton to Einstein
D'Abro, A. (Aram)
Relativity (Physics); Science -- Methodology
First in order among these tests we must mention the well-known
phenomenon of astronomical aberration, according to which the direction
of incidence of a ray of starlight varies annually as the earth
circumnavigates the sun. The obvious analogy of this phenomenon is the
slanting direction followed on the window pane of a moving train by
raindrops which to an observer stationed on the embankment would appear
to be falling vertically. This analogy might tempt us to assume that
inasmuch as the slant of the raindrops on the pane permits us to deduce
the speed of our train through the stagnant atmosphere, so now the
slant of the ray of starlight resulting from the earth’s motion should
yield us our velocity through the stagnant ether. But the conclusion
would be faulty; for if we reflect we shall see that we were able to
deduce our motion through the atmosphere, solely because we had reason
to assume that had our train stood motionless in the atmosphere the
raindrops would have appeared to fall vertically. But in the case of
astronomical aberration we have no means of basing our deductions on
any such preliminary information. We cannot tell from what directions
the rays of starlight would appear to issue were we at rest in the
ether; for we ignore the true positions of the stars. And so all that
astronomical aberration can yield us is the annual variation
in our velocity through the ether, hence our velocity relative to the
sun.[39] In short, astronomical aberration does not enable us to detect
our absolute speed through the ether, and we must rely on other means.
In all the experiments we shall have occasion to mention, the velocity
through the ether which we shall seek to determine will be that of our
earth; for, attached as we are to the earth’s surface, this will be
the speed we shall best be in a position to determine. Unfortunately,
the earth does not constitute a truly Galilean frame on account of its
acceleration or rotation round its axis. However, this acceleration of
the points on the earth’s surface is very small and the centrifugal
force to which it gives rise is scarcely perceptible. Calculation
shows that, so far as optical and electromagnetic experiments are
concerned, we may regard a frame attached to the earth as constituting
a Galilean frame, possessing velocity but no acceleration, at least as
a first approximation. Nevertheless this statement is not altogether
correct. Experiments can be devised both in mechanics and in optics
which would reveal the earth’s acceleration or rotation. Of course this
is only natural, since acceleration, in contradistinction to
velocity through space, is known to be absolute.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account