The evolution of scientific thought from Newton to EinsteinD'Abro, A. (Aram)
Science
The evolution of scientific thought from Newton to Einstein
D'Abro, A. (Aram)
Relativity (Physics); Science -- Methodology
Furthermore, Maxwell had considered more especially the case of matter
at rest in the ether, and it was necessary to investigate the general
case of matter in motion. This extension of Maxwell’s theory, known
as the electrodynamics of moving bodies, was attempted by Hertz,
who assumed that matter in motion through the ether would drag the
ether along with it in its interior—a hypothesis not so radical,
but somewhat in line with that of Stokes. So long as conductors
were contemplated, Hertz’s hypothesis seemed to be in accord with
experiment; but when we came to consider dielectrics in motion, Hertz’s
anticipations were contradicted. Fizeau’s experiment in particular,
proving that the velocity of running water did not compound with the
velocity of the light in stagnant water, was incompatible with Hertz’s
hypothesis of a total drag. Also, in an experiment of a totally
different nature, dealing with the motion of a dielectric through a
magnetic field, Wilson proved the existence of the same partial drag,
given once again by Fresnel’s convection coefficient. It appeared,
therefore, that Fresnel’s convection coefficient was a fact which would
have to be fitted into any theoretical scheme of the electrodynamics of
moving dielectrics.
Now, Fresnel’s partial drag hypothesis, though seemingly confirmed
by experiment, had yet to be accounted for theoretically, and this
appeared impossible so long as we remained in such utter ignorance of
the ultimate constitution of dielectrics and of matter in general. At
this stage Lorentz started his theoretical investigations which were
to lead him to a refinement of Maxwell’s equations, extending their
application to cases where matter was present, either at rest or in
motion through the ether. As we have mentioned, Maxwell’s equations
[Pg 130]
had proved themselves incapable of accounting for dispersion. It
appeared necessary to conceive of some structure for dielectrics which
would act selectively, imposing different degrees of retardation on
light waves of different frequencies. Lorentz achieved this result by
assuming that electricity was atomic and that matter was constituted
by more or less complicated groupings of these electric atoms or
electrons.
In the case of dielectrics or non-conductors such as glass, the
electrons were assumed to be tied down to their atoms by elastic
forces. When disturbed they would vibrate with some characteristic
frequency depending on the magnitude of the elastic forces which held
them in place. If, then, a wave of light were transmitted through
the transparent dielectric, the electrons would be set into forced
vibration and the retarding effect these vibrations would impose on the
incident light would depend on the relative frequencies of the incident
light and of the natural frequencies of the electrons. In this way it
was possible to obtain a mathematical interpretation of dispersion.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account