The evolution of scientific thought from Newton to EinsteinD'Abro, A. (Aram)
Science
The evolution of scientific thought from Newton to Einstein
D'Abro, A. (Aram)
Relativity (Physics); Science -- Methodology
It is quite unnecessary to dwell on a number of further verifications
of Lorentz’s theory. All that we have wished to show is that the
empirical discoveries that lend weight to Lorentz’s electronic theory
are so numerous that it can certainly not be cast aside lightly.
Although no achievement in theoretical physics can ever claim to
be permanent, yet in view of the wonderful accuracy of Lorentz’s
previsions it would require some reason of a truly imperative nature
[Pg 132]
for us to feel justified in tampering with it in any essential detail.
Lorentz’s electronic theory is also perfectly consistent with the
negative experiments we have heretofore mentioned, since it explains
the existence of the Fresnel convection coefficient; and we have seen
that this coefficient in turn accounts for the negative results of
experiments conducted to the first order of approximation in dielectric
media moving through the ether. But Lorentz’s theory as it now stands
suggests that experiments conducted to a higher order of precision, to
the second order, for example, would cease to yield negative results;
so that with experiments of this sort our motion through the ether
would be detectible.[43]
Now, the Michelson and Morley experiment is precisely of this type.
It is a second-order experiment. It is assumed that the reader is
sufficiently familiar with it to render its detailed description
unnecessary. Stated briefly, the experiment proves that if waves of
light leave the centre of a sphere simultaneously, they will return in
perfect unison to the centre of the sphere after having been reflected
against the sphere’s inner surface, no matter in what direction through
the ether, or with what constant velocity, the sphere attached to the
earth may be moving. An explanation was suggested by both FitzGerald
and Lorentz, and was to the effect that the sphere had contracted in a
definite degree in the direction of its motion through the ether. The
sphere accordingly became an ellipsoid, and Michelson’s negative result
was explained.
More generally, any body, a yardstick, for example, when lying in the
direction of the earth’s motion through the ether, would be contracted
and become shorter than when placed perpendicularly to the ether
hurricane. However, we should never have any means of detecting this
contraction, for all things, the human body included, would participate
with it, whence observationally, at least, nothing would be changed.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account