The evolution of scientific thought from Newton to EinsteinD'Abro, A. (Aram)
Science
The evolution of scientific thought from Newton to Einstein
D'Abro, A. (Aram)
Relativity (Physics); Science -- Methodology
In view of the importance of the question, let us mention another
example. We remember that when discussing electrical phenomena in the
first pages of the preceding chapter, we mentioned that an electrified
body was surrounded by an electric field of force, whereas a current
was surrounded by both an electric and a magnetic field. Subsequent
experiments performed by Rowland confirmed the view that a charged body
in motion generated the same electric and magnetic fields as a current
flowing along a wire, so that we had to agree that a charged body in
motion developed a magnetic field by the sole virtue of its motion.
Now here again we are in a quandary to understand what is to be meant
by motion. Classical science assumed that motion in this case meant
motion with respect to the stagnant ether, and that an electric current
was constituted by the rushing of electrons through the ether. Numerous
difficulties beset this view. Owing to the earth’s motion through the
ether, every charged body on the earth’s surface would constitute
an electric current; so that around every electrically charged body
a magnetic field should be present. Yet experiment failed to detect
this magnetic field. Was it due to the crudeness of our experiments?
This solution was scarcely possible; for if we displaced our charged
body before a magnetised needle (Rowland’s experiment), the needle was
deflected, proving that experiments were perfectly able to detect the
magnetic field when it was truly produced. It appeared as though the
type of velocity that constituted a current was not velocity through
the ether at all, but velocity relative to the recording instrument
or, more generally, to the observer. Once again, the only type of
velocity which appeared to have any significance in nature was relative
velocity, and never velocity through the stagnant ether or absolute
space.
Hence, Einstein postulated his special principle of relativity,
according to which Galilean motion through the ether or space is
meaningless. This principle is, as we see, merely an extension of the
Newtonian mechanical principle to the case of the ether, or in other
words to electromagnetic and optical experiments.
What is called the special theory of relativity concerns the
rational consequences that must follow from the special principle.
These consequences may be anticipated as follows: If Galilean motion
through the ether is meaningless, the laws of electrodynamics must
remain invariant in form when we change our Galilean system of
reference. But this implies that the space and time transformations
which the co-ordinates of all points undergo, when we change systems,
must be given by the Lorentz transformations.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account