The evolution of scientific thought from Newton to EinsteinD'Abro, A. (Aram)
Science
The evolution of scientific thought from Newton to Einstein
D'Abro, A. (Aram)
Relativity (Physics); Science -- Methodology
When, however, we substitute four-dimensional space-time for
separate space and time, the difficulty vanishes. For now we
notice that all accelerated motions, regardless of whether they
be rectilinear or curvilinear, are represented by curved world-lines
in space-time. All these accelerated motions violate, therefore, the
flat space-time structure; and for this reason forces of inertia will
always be generated by them. On the other hand, when we consider
Galilean or uniform or translational motions, we see that, as in the
case of three-dimensional space, they will be represented by straight
lines. These motions will then stand in perfect harmony with the flat
space-time structure, and no forces of inertia will arise.
In this way, thanks to space-time, one of the outstanding difficulties
which confronted classical science, namely, the dual nature of space
and of motion, is accounted for.
[Pg 201]
CHAPTER XIX
VARIOUS POSSIBLE WORLDS
WE have seen that the great distinction between Einstein’s theory
and classical science arises from the value to be attributed to the
invariant velocity of the world. In the belief of classical science,
this velocity was infinite, and we were thus led to a world of separate
space and time. According to relativity, the value of the invariant
velocity is finite and is given by , the constant which enters
into Maxwell’s equations; this constant being illustrated physically by
the velocity of light in vacuo.
From a purely mathematical standpoint, however, if we disregard
the relations of reality, we may consider other purely formal
possibilities. Suppose that the invariant velocity, though finite,
were some number differing from Maxwell’s constant .
Obviously , being a maximum velocity, would have to be greater
than or equal to the highest velocity known to physicists, hence would
have to be equal to or greater than , velocity of light. Let us
therefore suppose that is greater than . As in Einstein’s
theory, we should still be faced with a world of four-dimensional
space-time, but this world would differ from that of relativity, owing
to the discrepancy existing between the invariant velocity and
Maxwell’s constant . This would indicate that the equations of
electromagnetics would no longer maintain the same form when we changed
Galilean frames. As a result, the erstwhile negative experiments in
electromagnetics should now yield positive results, and absolute
velocity through space would be detected. The theory of relativity
would have to be abandoned.
[Pg 202]
But we may consider still another case. Suppose that the invariant
velocity of the world were some imaginary quantity , where
stands, as before, for , and for some arbitrary
finite number. The square of this imaginary velocity being a negative
number, the square of would now assume the form
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account