The evolution of scientific thought from Newton to EinsteinD'Abro, A. (Aram)
Science
The evolution of scientific thought from Newton to Einstein
D'Abro, A. (Aram)
Relativity (Physics); Science -- Methodology
Our sole means of settling the problem is, then, to appeal to
experiment; to ultra-precise experiment in the present case, since the
crude variety would not enable us to reach a decision. The experiment
of the clocks, could it be performed with sufficient refinement,
would constitute one of these. Obviously it would be unwise to assume
that its result could be known with certainty in advance; for were
men to labour under any such belief, there would be no need for
them to experiment. We may, of course, question the likelihood of a
certain result occurring, basing our opinion on previous experiments
of a similar nature; but in the final analysis our understanding of
nature will issue from an accurate observation of facts and not from
a-prioristic metaphysics.
[Pg 227]
Unfortunately, as we mentioned previously, this experiment with
clocks or atoms cannot be performed with sufficient accuracy, so that
indirect methods must be considered. But it is precisely because all
the indirect experiments thus far attempted have yielded results
incompatible with the absoluteness of duration and distance that
Einstein was compelled to reject these secular beliefs of mankind.
Accordingly, we have every reason to anticipate that the clock
experiment would bear out Einstein’s views; in fact, were this not the
case, the entire theory would collapse.
Let us abandon these generalities, and consider the clock experiment
in a more vivid form. We refer to what is known as the problem of
the twins. In this we consider twin brothers one of whom remains on
earth, while the other steps on to a magic carpet and visits distant
Arcturus. On his return he finds that his brother has grown old and
decrepit, while he himself has preserved his youth.
This particular consequence of the theory has been one of the stumbling
blocks of practically every lay writer who has devoted his time to
criticising the theory of relativity. Some have stated that Einstein
never upheld any such absurdity, and that the whole trouble must
be ascribed to his too enthusiastic followers. Others have stated
that the conclusions violated the rules of logic in that they led
to inconsistencies; and that if Einstein’s theory necessitated such
results, it should be regarded as a gigantic hoax from beginning to end.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account