The evolution of scientific thought from Newton to EinsteinD'Abro, A. (Aram)
Science
The evolution of scientific thought from Newton to Einstein
D'Abro, A. (Aram)
Relativity (Physics); Science -- Methodology
Both we and the traveller carry optical clocks, of precisely
the same dimensions when placed side by side; so that for either
one of us, 100,000 oscillations of our respective light rays in our
respective optical clocks correspond to one second of our respective
times. Let us assume that the optical clock of the travelling observer
is placed crosswise to his motion with respect to us, so that his light
days oscillate back and forth in a direction perpendicular to his
relative motion. So far as the traveller is concerned, the light rays
of his optical clock will oscillate along one same straight line 1.5
kilometres in length; and if during his entire trip back and forth he
finds that his clock has oscillated times, he will be justified
in saying that according to his optical clock his trip has lasted
seconds. This, in the precise numerical example
we have chosen, would turn out to be twenty years.
Now let us examine the problem from our own point of view; that is to
say, let us refer all measurements to our own Galilean system attached
to the earth. In this Galilean frame of ours the oscillating wave of
light of the traveller will not follow a to-and-fro motion along the
[Pg 230]
same straight line. It will follow a zigzag line analogous to a series
of ’s placed end to end. The total length of this path followed
by the light wave must therefore be longer than when referred to the
frame of the traveller; in the present numerical example it would
be just twice as long. The question then arises: “How long will it
take for the traveller’s wave of light to describe this zigzag line
back and forth when time is measured according to the standards of
our Galilean frame attached to the earth?” The postulate of the
invariant velocity of light gives us the answer immediately. Since
the zigzag line followed by the light wave in our frame is just twice
as long as the succession of superposed up-and-down lines which it
follows in the traveller’s frame, and since, whether referred to one
frame or the other, the velocity of the light wave along its path must
be the same (invariant velocity of light in all Galilean frames),
then the immediate conclusion is that the total duration of the
oscillations will be twice as long when measured by us as when measured
by the traveller.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account