The evolution of scientific thought from Newton to EinsteinD'Abro, A. (Aram)
Science
The evolution of scientific thought from Newton to Einstein
D'Abro, A. (Aram)
Relativity (Physics); Science -- Methodology
It follows that if in a Galilean frame we place side by side, at rest,
an optical clock, a vibrating atom, a piece of radium gradually losing
its mass, and a top revolving without friction, the time determinations
defined by all these phenomena will be identical, since all these are
perfectly isolated from external influences. To be more precise, if
a sodium atom vibrates so many times per second, as measured by the
optical clock of its Galilean system, it should still vibrate exactly
the same number of times per second (as measured by the clock of the
frame) even if the constant velocity of the Galilean frame (with
respect to some standard Galilean frame) has been changed to some other
constant velocity. In short, all physical phenomena at rest in a frame
would evolve at exactly the same rate in terms of the optical clock of
the frame, regardless of the magnitude of the Galilean motion of the
frame; since, according to the special principle of relativity, this
absolute Galilean motion is entirely meaningless.
If observation, by any chance, should prove that the relative rates
of vibration of the atom and the clock were to vary according to the
Galilean frame in which we set them, we should have a physical means of
differentiating one Galilean frame from another, hence of determining
the velocity of our frame through the ether; and the special principle
of relativity would have to be abandoned. Assuming, therefore,
Einstein’s premises to be correct, we must agree that the vibrations
of the optical clock constitute as perfect a means of determining
congruent intervals of time as it is possible for physicists to
obtain. Finally, we see that in any Galilean frame exactly the same
[Pg 233]
time-determinations would be obtained whether we made use of an optical
clock, a top spinning on its axis without friction, a vibrating atom,
or a mechanical clock, provided all these bodies were at rest as a
whole in our Galilean frame.
Consider, then, two Galilean frames, each containing an optical clock
and a top spinning without friction on its axis. If, when the two
frames are brought to relative rest, side by side, the two tops are
spinning at exactly the same rate, both executing rotations per
second when measured in terms of their respective clocks, then exactly
the same correlation must exist when the Galilean frames are moving
apart. It is therefore a matter of indifference whether the observers
in the frames measure time by means of their optical clocks or by means
of the rotations of their tops.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account