The evolution of scientific thought from Newton to EinsteinD'Abro, A. (Aram)
Science
The evolution of scientific thought from Newton to Einstein
D'Abro, A. (Aram)
Relativity (Physics); Science -- Methodology
It would not be legitimate to attempt to apply the special principle
of relativity, and to argue as though the wanderer had always been at
rest; for by so doing we should be assuming that he had never suffered
acceleration, and we should therefore have to credit his brother with
having experienced this acceleration. The problem would be completely
modified; and, indeed, the relative aging would then be reversed. But
no argument against the theory could be invoked, for the simple reason
that we should be considering a totally different problem, one in which
the circumstances of acceleration were no longer the same.
For the sake of completeness let us assume that it is now the wanderer
who remains at rest, while the earth twin, the earth and the star
execute a backward-and-forward motion, being of course subjected, in so
doing, to acceleration when their velocity is reversed. Retaining the
same numerical values, we should find that the erstwhile wanderer had
waited twenty years, as before, for the return of his brother, but this
earth brother would now conclude that his absence had lasted ten years
instead of forty. So even from a purely numerical standpoint conditions
would not have been completely reversed. Thus, in a general way, we see
that when two observers leave each other, then meet again, one of the
[Pg 238]
two, if not both, must have been submitted to acceleration; otherwise
they could never meet again but would wander farther and farther apart
ad infinitum.[74] If we consider twins separating, then meeting
again, the younger of the two will invariably be the one who has
suffered acceleration.
We need not be surprised at these very real effects produced by
acceleration, for we must remember that acceleration is an absolute and
not a relative like mere velocity. A body has one velocity or another,
according to our point of view or choice of a frame of reference; but
when a body is accelerated the choice of our frame of reference is
irrelevant for the simple reason that acceleration betrays itself by
physical forces and stresses which may exert palpable influences.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account