The evolution of scientific thought from Newton to EinsteinD'Abro, A. (Aram)
Science
The evolution of scientific thought from Newton to Einstein
D'Abro, A. (Aram)
Relativity (Physics); Science -- Methodology
Once again, the theory of relativity as a theory of mathematical
physics may survive or may succumb. It is for experiment to give
the answer. If the anticipations of the theory should not conform
to experiment, if, for instance, the recent experiment of Miller
were considered conclusive as detecting velocity through the
ether, it would be impossible to save the theory, at least in its
present form.[75] But we must not confuse the ability of the theory
to portray the workings of nature with its legitimacy as a perfectly
consistent and rational doctrine of thought. On this last point no
doubt exists. The theory has been scrutinised by the greatest of living
mathematicians and not the slightest error of mathematical reasoning,
nor therefore of logic, has been found in it.
Fig. VIa
As a final illustration of this same problem of the relativity of
simultaneity we may present a geometrical analogy. We have only to
consider two points and at the same distance above a line
, and then to consider the points and at the same
distance above another line . We have only to look at the figure
to realise that and are at the same distance neither from
nor from . Only should the two lines and
coincide would they be so.
It is much the same in relativity. The straight lines and
correspond to the time directions of the two different observers.
Classical science, assuming time to be absolute, considered the two
lines coincident. Relativity has proved the error of this belief.
[Pg 243]
PART III
THE GENERAL THEORY OF RELATIVITY
[Pg 245]
CHAPTER XXIII
POTENTIALS AND FORCES
ACCORDING to classical science, force may be defined as the product of
mass by acceleration. When no force is acting, the motion of a body is
always Galilean; only when a force is acting will the motion of a body
become accelerated.[76]
Now it must be noted that when a body is subjected to some definite
muscular pull the magnitude of this pull or force depends solely on the
muscular effort which we are willing or able to produce. On the other
hand, when a body is situated in the gravitational field of the earth,
the gravitational force which acts upon it and which is commonly known
as the weight of the body not only depends on the mass of the earth
but likewise varies with the mass of the body. In order to remedy this
indeterminateness, it is usual to specify that the body on which the
force is acting is one of unit mass; it is then called a test-body.
Under these circumstances, we can explore a field of force by placing
our test-body in successive regions of space and determining the
magnitude and direction of the force which is acting on the body. When
we have mapped out the magnitude and direction of the force for every
point of space, we are in a position to state that we have determined
the lay of the field of force.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account