The evolution of scientific thought from Newton to EinsteinD'Abro, A. (Aram)
Science
The evolution of scientific thought from Newton to Einstein
D'Abro, A. (Aram)
Relativity (Physics); Science -- Methodology
This equality in the numerical values of the two types of masses will
entail important consequences. For suppose, indeed, that the equality
did not hold. This would imply that two billiard balls might present
exactly the same gravitational mass, yet differ in the value of their
respective inertial masses. If, then, the two balls were to be released
simultaneously and allowed to fall from the same height towards the
earth, their gravitational masses being equal, both balls would be
subjected to exactly the same pull by the earth. But their inertial
masses being assumed unequal, the ball whose inertial mass was greater
would oppose the acceleration of the fall more strenuously than would
be the case with the ball of lesser inertial mass. As a result, the
balls would not reach the earth’s surface simultaneously. On the other
hand, if the two types of masses are identical, we may be assured that
any two objects released from the same point will reach the earth’s
surface at the same instant (provided we operate in vacuo so
that the resistance of the air does not interfere with their fall). It
was precisely because experiment had demonstrated the existence of the
same rate of fall for all bodies released from the same height, that
Galileo was led to recognise the equality of the two masses. It may
be mentioned, however, that ultra-precise experiments (notably with
Eötvös’ torsion balance) have since verified these results with extreme
accuracy.[80]
We see, therefore, that the equality of the two types of masses allows
us to anticipate that an observer situated in a falling elevator would
have no weight. He might be standing on a weighing machine, but the
needle would always register zero. The fact is that both observer and
weighing balance would be falling with the same motion towards the
earth; hence the observer’s feet would never press against the balance.
These anticipations may appear to be self-evident; but it is important
to note that they are in no wise self-evident until we have recognised
the perfect equality of the two types of masses. If such an equality
did not exist, the observer in the elevator might still press against
the scales of the weighing machine or might hit the ceiling of the
elevator, and it would no longer be correct to anticipate that
elevator, scales and observer would all fall with exactly the same
velocity and acceleration.
[Pg 254]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account