The evolution of scientific thought from Newton to EinsteinD'Abro, A. (Aram)
Science
The evolution of scientific thought from Newton to Einstein
D'Abro, A. (Aram)
Relativity (Physics); Science -- Methodology
These are the results which we must weave into the general model of
space-time, unless we reject Einstein’s postulate of equivalence, and
maintain that fields of gravitation produced by matter have no more
in common with fields of inertia than they have with electromagnetic
fields, for instance. The postulate of equivalence, as we have
seen, appears to be justified owing to the empirical fact that the
two types of masses are identical. But we now propose to show that
quite independently of this empirical fact, even if the postulate of
equivalence had never been stated in a specific manner, a natural
mathematical generalisation of the geometry of space-time would have
led us indirectly to exactly the same identification of forces of
inertia and gravitation. Accordingly, let us recall briefly the results
we arrived at in Chapter XXIII when we
examined the origin of forces of inertia in our space-time model.
We remember that space-time was assumed to be perfectly flat, so
that its geodesics were Euclidean straight lines when referred to
Cartesian mesh-systems of equal four-dimensional cubes. These Cartesian
mesh-systems, splitting up space-time into mutually perpendicular
rectilinear directions, constituted the geometrical representations of
our methods of breaking up space-time into space and time for purposes
of referring our measurements to Galilean systems of reference. In
these Cartesian mesh-systems the ’s of space-time maintained
constant values throughout, and the numerical values of these
’s represented the potentials of the field of inertial force.
These potentials being constants, remaining unchanged in value from
[Pg 262]
point to point in our Cartesian systems, no field of force could be
present; and this was in full accord with what we know of Galilean
systems, since these systems are characterised by the total absence
of all such fields. Furthermore, as all free bodies and light waves
followed geodesics in space-time according to the requirements of Least
Action, and as these geodesics when referred to Cartesian systems were
straight lines, free bodies and light waves would always appear to
follow straight lines with constant speeds when observed from Galilean
frames. This was in accord with Newton’s law of inertia.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account