The evolution of scientific thought from Newton to EinsteinD'Abro, A. (Aram)
Science
The evolution of scientific thought from Newton to Einstein
D'Abro, A. (Aram)
Relativity (Physics); Science -- Methodology
It is easy to see that these physical conditions are precisely those
which we have found to exist in a gravitational field produced by
matter. The straightest type of mesh-system around a point (namely, a
semi-Cartesian mesh-system) would correspond to that of the observer
in the falling elevator or in the hollow projectile, since for an
observer in a frame of this type the force of gravitation disappears
in the immediate interior of his frame, but reappears at more distant
points. Further, space-time being curved, its geodesics would no longer
be Euclidean straight lines. They would still appear approximately
straight when referred to a semi-Cartesian mesh-system in the immediate
neighbourhood of the point for which the mesh-system was approximately
one of equal four-dimensional cubes; but their curvature would
become more and more apparent when we surveyed them from this same
mesh-system in more distant regions. The physical interpretation of
this geometrical fact would be afforded by the seemingly uniform and
rectilinear motion of free bodies and rays of light in the immediate
neighbourhood of the falling elevator when viewed by an observer
situated in this falling frame, and by the apparent acceleration of
these bodies in regions more distant from the falling elevator.
It is therefore obvious that the existence of a non-Euclideanism of
[Pg 264]
space-time around matter would betray itself physically in exactly the
same way as a field of gravitation produced by matter.[85] Assuming
this generalisation to be correct, we see that no essential difference
can exist between a field of gravitation and one of inertia. Both types
of field arise from a relationship between the mesh-system adopted
by the observer, and the fundamental structure of the space-time
continuum. The only difference that exists is that in interstellar
space far from matter, space-time being flat, it is always possible
to select a Cartesian mesh-system corresponding to a Galilean system
in which no field of force is present, whereas in the neighbourhood
of matter, owing to the inherent curvature of space-time, the nearest
approach to Galilean frames is given by semi-Cartesian or semi-Galilean
frames (falling elevator). In such frames the field of force cannot
vanish throughout the frame at more or less distant points.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account