The evolution of scientific thought from Newton to EinsteinD'Abro, A. (Aram)
Science
The evolution of scientific thought from Newton to Einstein
D'Abro, A. (Aram)
Relativity (Physics); Science -- Methodology
Consider, then, one such straight line or geodesic, and let it be that
particular great circle which we call the equator. According to the
axioms of Euclid’s geometry two perpendiculars drawn at two different
points of the same straight line can never meet; they lie parallel to
one another. On the sphere, on the other hand, two perpendiculars to
the equator are two meridians and these meridians always meet at the
pole. In fact it is impossible to draw any two great circles on the
sphere which do not intersect. Hence we see that no parallel geodesics
can exist in Riemann’s geometry. Likewise, whereas in Euclid’s geometry
the sum of the three angles of a triangle is equal to two right angles,
in Riemann’s geometry this sum is always greater than two right angles.
This we could easily verify by stretching ropes between three distant
points on the earth’s surface so as to form a triangle, and then
summing the values of the angles at the three corners of our triangle.
A similar verification would ensue if we were to effect measurements
along a circumference and its diameter. Thus, if at a central point
on the earth’s surface we fix one end of a rope and cause the other
extremity to rotate around the central point, it will describe a circle
on the earth’s surface. We shall then find, upon measuring the length
of the circumference marked out by the extremity of the rope, that the
ratio of the length of this circumference to the length of the diameter
is a variable number, always smaller than and depending
on the area covered by our circle; whereas in Euclidean geometry this
ratio would be the constant number .
There is still another result of importance which must be mentioned.
On a plane, the farther we wander along a straight line, the farther
we move from our starting point, whereas on our sphere we see that if
we follow a straight line or geodesic we shall finally return to our
starting point after having circled the earth. We express this fact by
saying that in Riemann’s geometry space is finite, yet unbounded. It
is finite since we cannot wander away indefinitely from our starting
point; it is unbounded because however far we go, we never come to a
stone wall or a gap beyond which we can proceed no farther. On the
other hand, Euclidean space, such as that of the plane surface, is
infinite and unbounded.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account