The evolution of scientific thought from Newton to EinsteinD'Abro, A. (Aram)
Science
The evolution of scientific thought from Newton to Einstein
D'Abro, A. (Aram)
Relativity (Physics); Science -- Methodology
It is impossible to show more clearly that the geometry we attribute
to space is nothing but an expression of the properties of our bodies
and measuring rods when displaced, since here we have a plane which
is Euclidean or Riemannian in its geometry according to the behaviour
of the bodies that glide over its surface. And so we see that two
alternative methods of interpreting non-Euclidean geometry are open to
us. Either we may regard our rods as Euclidean and applied to a curved
surface, or else we may attribute non-Euclideanism to the behaviour of
our rods on a flat surface.[20]
Now in this chapter we have discussed only non-Euclidean geometries
of two dimensions. Riemann’s geometry and Lobatchewski’s geometry
are more particularly these same geometries, extended to the case of
three dimensions. We can easily see how Riemann’s geometry of three
dimensions would arise.
We have only to suppose that, as contrasted with Euclidean solids, all
material bodies expand as did the shadows when displaced from a fixed
centre. But the Riemannian observer of course would have no realisation
of this expansion, owing to the modified laws of light propagation and
owing to his own body’s expanding in company with all other bodies. So
he would be of the opinion that all these bodies maintained their same
shape and size, that is, remained congruent when displaced. In fact, if
he applied the test of practical congruence he would find that these
bodies which the Euclidean observer would claim were expanding were,
so far as he himself was concerned, always the same both in visual
appearance and as regards exploration by the sense of touch. If our
Riemannian being were to view bodies which the Euclidean man considered
rigid and undeformable, he would assert without hesitation that those
bodies were decreasing in size as they approached a certain point. Once
again maintenance of shape and size is essentially relative.
All the conclusions which we reached when discussing a Riemannian
[Pg 69]
world of two dimensions can be extended to the case of three
dimensions. Thus, a Riemannian universe or spherical space of three
dimensions is finite but unbounded. Travelling for a sufficient length
of time along a geodesic or straight line, we should return finally
to our starting point, and rays of light which follow geodesics would
circle round our space.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account