The evolution of scientific thought from Newton to EinsteinD'Abro, A. (Aram)
Science
The evolution of scientific thought from Newton to Einstein
D'Abro, A. (Aram)
Relativity (Physics); Science -- Methodology
We remember that Newton refers to absolute time as “flowing uniformly.”
But of course this allusion to time does not lead us very far, for a
rate of flow can be recognised as uniform only when measured against
some other rate of flow taken as standard. Obviously some further
definition will have to be forthcoming. Now both Galileo and Newton
recognised as a result of clock measurements that approximately
free bodies moving in an approximately Galilean frame described
approximately straight lines with approximately constant speeds. Newton
then elevates this approximate empirical discovery to the position
of a rigorous principle, the principle of inertia, and states
that absolutely free bodies will move with absolutely constant speeds
along perfectly straight lines, hence will cover equal distances in
equal times. When expressed in this way as a rigorous principle, the
space and time referred to are the absolute space and time of Newtonian
science. In other words, it is the principle of inertia coupled with
an understanding of spatial congruence that yields us a definition of
congruent stretches of absolute time.
In practice, a definition of this sort entails measurements with rods;
that is to say, we measure off equal distances along the straight path
of a body and then define as congruent, or equal, the times required by
the body to describe these congruent spatial distances. It is obvious
that, however perfect our measurements, errors of observation will
always creep in. Furthermore, a body moving under ideal conditions
of observation can never be contemplated; hence all we can hope to
obtain is the greatest possible approximation. But although physical
measurements become inevitable as soon as we wish to obtain a concrete
definition, an objective criterion of equal durations, we are able
to proceed in our mechanical deductions in a purely mathematical
way without further appeal to experiment. The principle of inertia,
together with the other fundamental principles of mechanics, enables
us, therefore, to place mechanics on a rigorous mathematical basis, and
rational mechanics is the result.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account