The Evolution of StatesRobertson, J. M. (John Mackinnon)
History
The Evolution of States
Robertson, J. M. (John Mackinnon)
Europe -- Politics and government; Great Britain -- Politics and government; Political science -- History
Of this policy, the economic result was to carry still further the
depression of Italian agriculture. The corn supplied at low rates or
given away by the administration was of course bought or taken in the
cheapest markets--those of Sardinia and Sicily, Egypt, Africa, and
Gaul--and importation once begun would be carried to the utmost lengths
of commercialism. Italian farms, especially those at a distance from
the capital,[194] could not compete with the provinces save by still
further substituting large slave-tilled farms for small holdings, and
grinding still harder the face of the slave. When finally Augustus,[195]
definitely establishing the system of lowered prices and doles,
subsidised the trade in the produce of conquered Egypt to feed his
populace, and thus still further promoted the importation of the
cheapest foreign grain, the agriculture of a large part of Italy, and
even of parts of some provinces, was practically destroyed.
It has been argued by M'Culloch (_Treatises and Essays: History of
Commerce_, 2nd ed. p. 287, _note_) that it is impossible that the
mere importation of the corn required to feed the populace--say a
million quarters or more--could have ruined the agriculture of
Italy. This expresses a misconception of what took place. The doles
were not universal, and the emperors naturally preferred to limit
themselves as far as possible to paying premiums for the
importation and cheap sale of corn. (Cp. Suetonius, _Claudius_, c.
19, and the Digest, iii, 4, 1; xiv, i, 1, 20; xlvii, ix, 3, 8; l,
v, 3, etc.) All of the conquered provinces, practically, had to pay
a tithe of their produce; and where corn was specially cheap it
would be likely to come to Rome in that form. (Cp. Dureau de la
Malle, _Écon. polit. des Romains_, ii, 424 _sq._) Many of the
patrician families, besides, owned great estates in Africa, and
they would receive their revenues in produce. Egyptian, Sardinian,
Sicilian, and African corn could thus easily undersell Italian for
ordinary consumption. For the rest, the produce of Egypt would be a
means of special revenue to the emperor. Cp. M'Culloch's own
statement, p. 291.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account