Many millions of dollars during recent months have been poured into
oil company flotations that in all likelihood will never yield any
return whatever. Even well-organized companies, directed by men of
experience, seldom prove bonanzas in a day when leases command very
high prices; the exception arising where the company happens to be the
first comer in the field that later develops important production.
The oil business partakes of the nature of most other industries; it
yields profits when fortunately located and economically operated. But
there is no certainty that even the company which possesses leases in
established fields will prove profitable. Under the circumstances it is
ridiculous to assume that mushroom promotions, by men with no actual
experience in the oil business, and whose talents lie rather in the
direction of writing advertisements, can yield profits to those foolish
enough to invest in them.
The experience of one of the large producing companies, operating in
the best fields of this country, financed exclusively by oil men and
directed by some of the ablest men in the business, may be cited as an
instance of the uncertainty of profits. This company produced about
five million barrels of crude oil in 1919 and sold at the relatively
high prices then being obtained. Nevertheless, the company’s profit
and loss statement for the year showed a net loss of approximately
$1,000,000. This does not mean, of course, that this company is a
liability to its owners. It may have expended in work that could not
properly be capitalized, large sums of money that will eventually
be repaid out of production. It is easily conceivable that without
any material increase in its investment its yield of oil might be so
augmented by 1921 as to make its business show a very handsome profit.
What this case does prove is that something more than good leases,
experienced men and ample capital is needed to insure large returns
from money put into oil promotions.
People who clamour against the prices exacted by producers of crude
oil overlook the fact that wells have an unfailing habit of playing
out. This means that a producing company must never cease drilling and
exploring. To do so would mean an early decline in its production and
eventual failure even of its best wells. The monetary return from a big
producer must not only offset the cost of that well but repay the owner
the cost of drilling a large number of dry holes, abandoned after large
expenditures.
Production in the United States is only kept up by the work of the
“wild-catter” in locating new pools and by more intensive drilling of
the old fields. Both involve heavy costs. There were drilled in this
country last year no fewer than twenty-nine thousand new wells, but the
net increase in production over 1918 was but twenty-two million barrels
of crude. The declining yield of wells necessitates amortization to
cover the cost of new wells to take their place.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account