One of the water-plants of Southern Europe, _Aldrovandia vesiculosa_,
which is also to be found in swamps on the northern ridge of the
Alps, possesses, in addition to the capturing and digesting apparatus
proper, an active motile apparatus, which is set in motion through
sensitive hairs. When I found the plant for the first time in a swamp
at Lindau, on the Lake of Constance, I took it at first sight for an
_Utricularia_, for the two plants resemble each other in external
appearance (cf. Figs. 22 and 29), but the modification of the leaves
into traps is quite different. On both halves of the leaf-blade there
are numerous bristles (Fig. 30, _A_), and the lightest touch on these
by a little water animal acts as a releasing stimulus to the motile
elements of the leaf (_Stch_). As in the Venus fly-trap, the two halves
of the leaf close together somewhat quickly, but quite quietly, and the
animal is caught. Fig. 30 shows a section of one of these traps in its
closed state. The captive animals cannot escape, because the margins of
the leaf shut quite tightly on one another, and are beset with little
teeth. Numerous little glands (_Dr_) secrete a digestive juice, and
after some days, or even weeks, the insoluble remains of the minute
animals may be found inside the trap.
[Illustration: FIG. 30. _Aldrovandia_: its trap apparatus. _A_, open.
_St_, stalk of the leaf. _Spr_, blade of the leaf. _Stch_, sensitive
bristles. _Dr_, glands. _B_, closed, a cross-section.]
Many more cases of animal-catching plants might be adduced, but
it is far from my intention to try to describe all the existing
contrivances; those already mentioned may suffice to give an idea of
the diversity and of the detailed effectiveness of these adaptations.
They amplify--so it seems to me--our conception of the scope of natural
selection, by showing us that adaptations may arise which are quite
foreign to the original mode of life of the organism in question,
and stand, indeed, in apparent contradiction to its fundamental
physiological processes. It is hardly necessary to enter into a
special argument to show that they can only have been brought about
in the course of natural selection, since every other interpretation
of their occurrence fails. Neither climatic nor any other external
direct influence could have effected these modifications of the parts
of plants, which are all so different, yet all so well suited to
their purpose; they are different even in plants growing quite close
together, like the sundew and the butterwort. The Lamarckian principle
of use and disuse hardly enters into the question at all, since plants
do not possess a will, and we can hardly speak of 'chance' where we
have to do with such complex and diversely combined transformations.
A process of selection actually operative in each of these cases can
easily be thought out, and I shall leave it to my readers themselves
to do this, and shall only indicate that we have to do with increasing
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account