off little bits much more easily from a piece that was held firmly by
the anemone than from one that was lying loose upon the ground, and
this may have caused it to do intentionally what was at first done by
chance. But the sea-anemone, suffering no harm from the fish--indeed,
its association of ideas, if I may use the expression, must rather
have been little fishes and unexpected food--had no cause to shoot
its microscopic arrows at it, and did not do so even when the fish
concealed itself among the tentacles. This latter habit on the part of
the fish would be developed into an instinct through natural selection,
since the individuals that most frequently exhibited it would be the
best protected, and therefore, on an average, the most likely to
survive. Whether the benevolent attitude of the anemone towards the
fish is to be regarded as the expression of an instinct is open to
dispute, for it is quite conceivable that each individual sea-anemone
is disposed to gentleness by the behaviour of the fish, and so the
development of a special hereditary instinct was unnecessary, because
without it each anemone reacted in the manner most likely to secure its
own advantage[7].
[7] Since the above was written Plate has observed several similar
cases in the Red Sea. A little fish lives along with the anemone,
_Crambactis aurantiaca_, a foot in size, and not only conceals itself
among its tentacles, but remains among them when the anemone draws them
in. These fishes, therefore, must be immune against the stinging-cells
of the sea-anemone; and in the same way another species of fish
appears to be immune from the strong poison secreted by sea-urchins
of the genus _Diadema_ from the points of their spines, among which
the fishes live. This relation certainly seems more like a one-sided
adaptation on the part of the fishes than a true symbiosis, but in the
cases observed by Sluiter the return service of the fishes seems to
be regularly rendered. Here, as everywhere else in nature, there are
transition stages, and a one-sided protective relation may gradually,
under favourable circumstances, be transformed into a symbiosis.
The same may be true of the fish as far as laying its booty in the
mouth of the anemone is concerned; there may be no inherited instinct
in this; it may be an intelligent action, which is learnt anew in the
lifetime of each individual.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account