And how diversely are these again modified in the different genera
and species of orchids, of which one is adapted to the visits of
butterflies exclusively, as _Orchis ustulata_, another to those of
bees, as _Orchis morio_, and a third to those of flies, as _Ophrys
muscifera_. These flowers are adapted to insect visits in the minutest
details of the form of the petals, which are smooth, as if polished
with wax, where insects are not intended to creep, but velvety or hairy
where the path leads to the nectar, and at the same time to the pollen
and the stigma. And then there is the diversity in the form and colour
of the 'honey-guides' on the 'alighting surface,' that is, the under
lip of the flower, upon which the insect sits and holds fast, while it
pushes its head as far as possible into the spur, so that its proboscis
may reach the nectar lying deep within it! Even though we cannot
pretend to guess at the significance of every curve and colour-spot in
one of the great tropical orchids, such as _Stanhopea tigrina_, yet we
may believe, with Sprengel, that all this has its significance, or has
had it for the ancestors of the plant in question, and in fact that
the flower is made up of nothing but adaptations, either actual or
inherited from its ancestors, although sometimes perhaps no longer of
functional importance.
So far, then, we have illustrated the fact that there are hundreds and
thousands of contrivances in flowers adapted solely to the visits of
insects and to securing cross-fertilization, and these adaptations go
so far that we might almost believe them to be the outcome of the most
exact calculation and the most ingenious reflection. But they all admit
of interpretation through natural selection, for all these details,
which used to be looked upon as merely ornamental, are directly or
indirectly of use to the species; directly, when, for instance, they
concern the dusting of the insect with the pollen; indirectly, when
they are a means of attracting visits.
Moreover, the evidence of the operation of the processes of selection
becomes absolutely convincing when we consider that, as in symbiosis,
there are always two sets of adaptations taking place independently
of one another--those of the flowers to the visits of the insects,
and those of the insects to the habit of visiting the flowers. To
understand this clearly we must turn our attention to the insects, and
try to see in what way they have been changed by adapting themselves to
the diet which the flowers afford.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account