All these are contrivances which have gradually originated through the
habit of carrying home pollen for the helpless larvæ shut up in the
cells. They have developed differently in the various groups of bees,
probably because the primary variations with which the process of
selection began were different in the various ancestral forms.
In the ancestors of those which carry pollen on the abdomen there
was probably a thick covering of hair on the ventral surface of the
body, which served as a starting-point for the selection, and, in
consequence, the further course of the adaptation would be concerned
solely with this hair-covered surface, while variations in other less
hairy spots would remain un-utilized.
After all this it will no longer seem a paradoxical statement that the
existence of gaily coloured, diversely formed, and fragrant flowers is
due to the visits of insects, and that, on the other hand, many insects
have undergone essential transformations in their mouth-parts and
otherwise as an adaptation to a flower diet, and that an entire order
of insects with thousands of species--the Lepidoptera--would not be
in existence at all if there had been no flowers. We must now attempt
to show, in a more detailed way, how, by what steps, and under what
conditions, our modern flowers have arisen from the earlier flowering
plants. In this I follow closely the classic exposition which we owe to
Hermann Müller.
The ancestral forms of the modern higher plants, the so-called
'primitive seed plants' or 'Archisperms,' were all anemophilous, as the
Conifers and Cycads are still. Their smooth pollen-grains, produced
in enormous quantities, fell like clouds of dust into the air, were
carried by the wind hither and thither, and some occasionally alighted
on the stigma of a female flower. In these plants the sexes often occur
separately on different trees or individuals, and there must be a
certain advantage in this when the pollination is effected by the wind.
The male flowers of the Archisperms would be visited by insects in
remote ages, just as they are now; but the visitors came to feed upon
the pollen, and did not render any service to the plant in return;
they rather did it harm by reducing its store of pollen. If it was
possible to cause the insect to benefit the plant at the same time
as it was pillaging the pollen, by carrying some of it to female
blossoms and thereby securing cross-fertilization, it would be of
great advantage, for the plant would no longer require to produce such
enormous quantities of pollen, and the fertilization would be much
more certain than when it depended on the wind. It is obvious that the
successful pollination of anemophilous plants implies good weather and
a favourable wind.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account