common, and, since they are only fully displayed during the breeding
season, that is, when the male is sexually excited, they will have an
exciting effect on the female too. These inflated horns are symptoms
of excitement, and they arouse it in the female. In exactly the same
way the decorative feathers, the ruby-red and emerald-green feather
collars of the humming-birds and birds of Paradise, are only erected
and displayed when the males are wooing, and they, too, act as signs
of excitement. This is not to say that the gorgeousness of colour,
the eye-spots on the train of the peacock and the Argus pheasant, and
the hundreds of different kinds of beautiful feathers, do not also
exercise a fascinating influence; on the contrary, we cannot avoid
assuming this, since otherwise we could find no sufficient reason for
their origin. But the primary effect in wooing is not due to the mere
pleasure in the sight, or in the odour, or in the song, but to the
contagious excitement which these express. The females do not behave as
dispassionate judges, but as excitable persons which fall to the lot of
the male who is able to excite them most strongly. It may be, however,
that a sense of æsthetic satisfaction in perceiving such symptoms of
excitement may also have been evolved as an accessory effect, at least
in the higher and more intelligent animals.
In the lower animals, which are lacking not only in intelligence but
also in the higher and more complex differentiation of the sensory
system, the development of such secondary sex characters is rare or
altogether absent. Animals which have no sense of hearing can develop
no song, and animals which do not see cannot acquire gorgeous colours
as a means of exciting one sex through the other. But distinctive sex
coloration may arise even in lowly animals, though there can be no
question of æsthetic pleasure associated therewith; if the animals are
able to see the colours at all, sexual excitement may be associated
with these.
We need not wonder, therefore, that in the somewhat stupid fishes, in
the butterflies, and in the lower crustaceans, like the Daphnids, we
still find brilliant colours, which we can hardly interpret otherwise
than as the results of sexual selection. On the other hand, the absence
of such characters in animals of a still lower order, with still
simpler sense-organs, like the Polyps, Medusæ, Echinoderms, most Worms,
and the Sponges, affords an indirect confirmation of the correctness
of our view as to the reality of a sexual selection in the more highly
organized animals.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account