Darwin has shown that, in the equipment developed by the males in their
competition for the possession of the females, it is by no means only
those characters which may be considered 'beautiful' in themselves that
have to be considered; it is rather the striking characteristics which
mark their possessor and distinguish it from others that are primarily
important. In fact, it is the principle of 'mode' or 'fashion' which is
operative; something new is demanded, and as far as possible something
quite different from that which was previously considered beautiful.
Thus the starting-point for such processes of selection may have been
afforded by white spots on a black ground, or, indeed, by any light
spots on a dark ground, which may have been the primitive colour in
most cases. If in the course of a long series of generations these
spots became the common property of all the males, a possibility of
further change was opened up as soon as a new contrast cropped up as
a chance variation, which would then, under favourable conditions, be
the starting-point of a new process of selection. Darwin has cited
some cases in which, from a comparison of the dress of the young bird
with that of the adult, we may conclude that a transformation of the
colouring of the whole plumage must have taken place in the course of
the phylogenetic history.
In other cases the course of the process of selection has been such
that, though the general colouring has not been changed, variations
have appeared in particular regions of the body--spots or stripes which
accumulated through the ages and co-operated to form an increasingly
diverse and complex colour-scheme, such a 'marking' of the animal as we
may observe to-day, especially in butterflies, but also in birds.
It is a fine corroboration of the origin of bright colours through
sexual selection that, even in those groups of the animal kingdom which
are in general sexually monomorphic, there always occur some species
in which male and female are quite different, and a host of species in
which both sexes are alike in the main, yet with differences in certain
minor points. Among the parrots similarity of colouring prevails as
a general rule, but in New Guinea there lives a parrot the female of
which is a gorgeous blood-red and the male a beautiful light-green;
minor differences occur in many species, for instance, the female
of the horned parrot (_Cyanorhamphus cornutus_ Gm.) lacks the two
long black and red feathers on the head, that of the grass-parakeet
(_Melopsittacus undulatus_) is a slightly paler green and has not
the beautiful blue spots on the cheeks which the male possesses.
Innumerable similar instances might be cited, serving to show that all
these distinguishing characters of the males have been acquired step by
step and piece by piece, and are slowly and independently transferred
to the females--if, indeed, at all.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account