Our first theoretical insight into these relations came through Wilhelm
Roux, who, in 1881, gave expression to what had previously been
an open, if not quite conscious, secret, that 'functional stimulus
strengthens the organ,' that is to say, that an organ increases through
its own specific activity. Up till that time it had been believed that
it was merely the increased flow of blood that caused the increase in
the size of a much-used part. Roux showed that there is a 'quantitative
self-regulation of the organ according to the strength of the stimulus
supplied to it'; that the stimulated organ, that is, the organ which
is performing its normal function, may, in spite of the increased
breaking down or combustion (dissimilation), assimilate all the more
rapidly; that its used-up material is 'over-compensated,' and that
therefore it grows. He called this the 'trophic' or nutritive effect of
the stimulus, and in terms of this he explained the increase and the
heightened functional capacity of the much-used organ. Conversely, he
referred the decrease of a disused organ to 'functional atrophy,' which
sets in when there is a deficient compensation for the substance used
up in the metabolism.
But if we press for deeper analysis, we must ask: 'On what does this
trophic effect of functional stimulus depend?' Roux could not answer
this question when he wrote, nor can we do so now, as Plate has justly
emphasized. We are here face to face with the fundamental phenomenon
of life, metabolism; and, since we do not understand the causes of
this, we are not in a position to say why it varies in this way or in
that according to the 'stimulus.' But the fact itself is certain that
the organs respond up to a certain point to the claims made upon them;
they increase in proportion as they function more frequently or more
vigorously, they are able to respond to increased functional demands,
and this Roux has called 'functional adaptation.' As an animal adapts
itself to the claims of the conditions of its life, for instance, by
taking on a green or a brown protective colour according as it lives
on green or brown parts of plants, so the individual organ adapts
itself to the strength of the stimulus which impels it to function,
and increases or decreases in proportion to it. If _one_ kidney in Man
degenerate, or be surgically removed, the other begins to grow, and
goes on increasing until it has reached nearly twice its former size.
The specific stimulus which is brought to bear upon it by the urea
contained in the blood, and which forces it to grow, is twice as great
in the absence of the other kidney, and therefore the remaining kidney
grows in response to the increased stimulus and its 'trophic effect'
until its increase in size has reduced the functional intensity to the
normal proportion.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account