This was in the main the state of opinion at the time of the discovery
of innumerable minute filaments, the so-called 'spermatozoa' in the
'fertilizing' spermatic fluid of the male. The discovery was made in
1677 by Leeuwenhoek in the case of birds, mammals, and many other
animals. Albrecht von Haller (1708-77) was at first inclined to regard
these spermatozoa as the rudiments of the embryo, but later on, in the
course of his long life, he withdrew this theory, and declared them
to be a kind of parasite in the spermatic fluid without anything to
do with fertilization. The same opinion was expressed in 1835 by K.
E. von Baer, in opposition to the opinion of Prevost and Dumas, who
had rightly interpreted the spermatozoa as the essential elements of
the spermatic fluid. When one follows the matter out in detail, one
finds it almost incredible that such a number of mistakes should have
been made, and so many circuitous paths traversed, before even the
limited knowledge current in the middle of the nineteenth century was
attained--that is to say, enough to give ground for the assertion that
fertilization depends upon the contact of the spermatozoon with the
body of the egg. In 1843 Martin Barry had found the spermatozoa within
the egg-envelope of the rabbit ovum, but it was some time later (1852)
that the investigations of Meissner, Bischoff, and Newport established
the fact that the zoosperm penetrates through the egg-envelope. All
else remained quite obscure, and could not be cleared up as long as it
was believed, on the strength of observations which were in themselves
correct enough, that _several_ zoosperms were always necessary to
fertilize one ovum.
To an understanding of the process even in its most general outlines
there was lacking, apart from technical methods, an appreciation of the
morphological value of the ovum and the spermatozoon. It was necessary
to recognize both ovum and spermatozoon as _cells_ before their union
in fertilization could be regarded as the fusion of two cells, as a
copulation or conjugation of two minute elementary organisms. But this
knowledge only gained ground very gradually, and even in the sixties
opinions on the subject were very much divided. Moreover, there was an
entire absence of knowledge in regard to 'sexual' reproduction among
the lower plants, the Algæ, Fungi, Mosses, and Ferns, as well as of
any detailed acquaintance with the processes of fertilization among
flowering plants. All this had to be elucidated by the labours of many
distinguished observers before it was possible to say so much even as
this, that the process of fertilization depends in general on the union
of two cells.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account