It is remarkable how different the sperm-cells sometimes are in quite
nearly related species of Daphnids, as a glance at Fig. 66 will show;
and, on the other hand, how similar they may be in two species which
belong to different families, like _Bythotrephes longimanus_ (_b_),
and _Daphnella hyalina_ (_c_). The last fact may be explained as an
adaptation to similar conditions of fertilization. Both species have
effective copulatory organs, and their large delicate sperm-cells must
immediately adhere when they come into contact with the shell-less
ovum, and penetrate into it by means of amœboid processes. Conversely,
the difference between sperm-cells of allied species like _Sida
crystallina_ (_a_), _Moina rectirostris_ (_e_) and _M. paradoxa_ (_d_)
is related to different adaptations to nearly the same conditions of
fertilization. In _Sida_ (Fig. 66 _a_) the large flat sperm-cells, with
their fringed ends and their large soft surface, adhere easily to the
ova, and the same end is attained in _Moina rectirostris_ by means of
stiff radiating processes, while in the nearly related species, _Moina
paradoxa_, the male cell (_d_) resembles an Australian boomerang and
presses in like a wedge between the ova and the wall of the brood-sac.
[Illustration: FIG. 67. Spermatozoa of various animals, after
Ballowitz, Kölliker, and vom Rath. 1, man. 2, bat (_Vesperugo_). 3,
pig. 4, rat. 5, bullfinch. 6, newt. 7, skate (_Raja_). 8, beetle. 9,
mole-cricket (_Gryllotalpa_). 10, freshwater snail (_Paludina_). 11,
sea-urchin. Much magnified.]
In Fig. 67 a small selection of animal male cells is figured, all of
which take the form of sperm-threads or spermatozoa, and yet they
differ very much from one another in detail. It would undoubtedly
be of great interest to follow out these minute adaptations of the
sperm-cells to the conditions of fertilization, and to demonstrate
that their size, and especially their form, in the different species
of animals are adjusted to the special constitution of the ovum, its
envelope, and its micropyles, and to the ease or difficulty with which
it can be reached; but much information must be forthcoming before we
can even suggest, for instance, why the sperm-cell of the salamander
is so enormously long, large, and pointed at the head, while that of
Man (Fig. 67, 1) is comparatively short, with broad, flat head and a
recently discovered minute apex; or why those of Man and many fishes
(such as _Cobitis_) should be so much alike, and so on. From many
sides, however, we are led to conclude that even down to the minutest
details nothing is in vain, and that everything depends on adaptation.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account