But it is also intelligible that this twice repeated division of
the mother-egg-cell is necessary if the reduction in the number of
chromosomes to half is only possible in this way, since _this reduction
is indispensable_. If each of the two conjugating germ-cells contained
the full normal number of chromosomes, the segmentation-nucleus
would contain a double number, and if that went on, the number of
chromosomes would increase in arithmetical proportion from generation
to generation, and would soon become enormous. Even though we were not
otherwise certain that these chromosomes are units of a permanent
nature, which only apparently break up in the nuclear reticulum,
but in reality persist, the fact of reduction would point in this
direction. For if they were not permanent structures and distinct from
one another, and if their number depended solely on the quantity of
chromatin which the nucleus contains, the reduction in number might be
secured if the chromosomes in the growing egg and sperm-cells increased
in size more slowly than the cell-body and the other parts of the cell.
But from the fact that the reduction takes place not in this simple
way, but, in sperm-cells and in ova which require to be fertilized,
only through cell-division and a specific mode of nuclear division, we
may conclude that it cannot happen otherwise, that chromosomes are not
mere aggregates of organic substance, but organs whose number can only
be reduced by the extrusion of some of them from the cell.
It is true that there are ova in which the process of reduction does
not follow the course we have described, but the exceptions only
serve to confirm our view of the reducing significance of the polar
divisions, and of their persistence because of the necessity for
reduction.
As far back as the middle of the nineteenth century it was known
that in various animals the eggs develop without fertilization. This
reproduction by 'parthenogenesis' was first established with certainty
by the German bee-keeper Dzierzon in 1845, and then scientifically
corroborated by Rudolph Leuckart and C. Th. von Siebold. Although
parthenogenesis was at first observed only in a few groups of the
animal kingdom, in bees and some nocturnal Lepidoptera (Psychidæ
and Tineidæ), it has become more and more apparent in the course of
years that this 'virgin reproduction' is by no means a rare form
of reproduction, and that it occurs regularly and normally in many
cases, especially in the very diverse groups of the great series of
Arthropoda. Thus among insects it is found in certain saw-flies,
gall-flies, ichneumon-flies, in the honey bee, and in common wasps, and
it is particularly widespread among plant-lice (Aphides) such as the
vine-aphis (_Phylloxera_), whose prodigious multiplication in a short
time depends partly on the fact that all the generations, with the
exception of one, consist only of females with a parthenogenetic mode
of reproduction.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account