If we wish to understand clearly that, in these changes, we have
to do not merely with the alteration of a single part, but of many
parts which all work together, we have only to think of the still
more striking physical modifications which have taken place in many
tropical ants, and which have led to a dimorphism of the workers.
In many species, certainly, the only difference is in size, so that
one can distinguish between large workers and small, and the former
are sometimes five times as big as the latter. But even in the South
European _Pheidole megalocephala_, which is abundant in Italy, the
larger workers are also different in structure from the smaller, for
they have an enormous head with powerful jaws. They are usually known
as 'soldiers,' and are entrusted with the defence of the colony.
Emery directly observed in regard to _Colobopsis truncata_, an ant
which lives in the trunks of trees, that the soldiers, with their
enormous heads, occupied all the entrances to the nest, ready to seize
any intruder with their powerful jaws. In the Sauba ant (_Œcodoma
cephalotes_) Bates described three different types of worker, differing
in size, and although he was not able to determine with certainty what
the particular function of each was, there can be no doubt that they
have special offices, and that the differences in their structure are
adaptations to the differences in their functions. The same is true of
the Indian ant, _Pheidologeton diversus_, depicted in Fig. 106, whose
three forms of workers I owe to the kindness of Professor August Forel.
If the increase in the size of the head and jaws must bring with it an
increase in the thickness of the skeleton of these parts, as well as
a strengthening of the musculature of the head, it follows that the
strain on the body must be greater, just as in the case of the increase
in the weight of the stag's antlers, so that the skeleton of the
thorax must likewise have become thicker and heavier, the muscles and
nerves of the legs stronger, the articulations of the joints capable
of greater resistance; in short, a whole series of variations of other
parts must have taken place simultaneously, if the primary variation
was to be of use, and not to lead to the destruction of its possessor.
Here again we have a proof that the co-adaptation of many parts can
take place without any intervention of the Lamarckian principle, and
that there must be some other factor which brings this about.
[Illustration: FIG. 106. Three workers of the same species of Indian
Ant (_Pheidologeton diversus_), drawn from specimens supplied by
Prof. August Forel. _A_, the largest, _B_, the intermediate, _C_, the
smallest form.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account